Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

Assessing Changes in Synaptic Plasticity Using an Awake Closed-Head Injury Model of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Published on: January 20, 2023
Pressure injury severity and trajectory: A 5-year cohort study in an Australian health district
Michelle Barakat-Johnson1, Katja Heuer2, Darren Dela Rosa3
1Nursing and Midwifery Executive Services, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Wound Care Command Centre, Sydney Virtual Hospital, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; School of Health and Human Sciences, University of Huddersfield, United Kingdom.
Insights
Severe hospital-acquired pressure injuries, including Suspected Deep Tissue Injuries, can stabilize or resolve with timely assessment. Many severe pressure injuries are preventable, emphasizing early recognition for better outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Wound care and management
- Hospital-acquired conditions
- Patient outcomes research
Background:
- Severe hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs) pose significant challenges in patient care.
- Understanding the progression and outcomes of HAPIs is crucial for effective management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate outcomes of severe HAPIs (Stage 3, 4, Unstageable, Suspected Deep Tissue Injury).
- To examine wound trajectories, patient characteristics, and progression patterns over time.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from a 5-year cohort across four Australian hospitals.
- Data collected by Skin Integrity Leads, including initial reporting, specialist review, monitoring, and discharge assessments.
- Chi-square tests used to examine associations between clinical variables and injury severity.
Main Results:
- Heels were the most common injury site (53.4%) among 388 patients (mean age 72.2 years).
- Suspected Deep Tissue Injuries (sDTIs) were more likely to receive timely review and often resolved or were reclassified.
- Factors associated with severe HAPIs included orthopaedic fractures, age, musculoskeletal diagnoses, renal comorbidities, and aged care specialties.
Conclusions:
- Older age, comorbidities, reduced mobility, and specialized care identify high-risk groups for pressure injuries.
- Timely assessment of sDTIs can lead to stabilization or resolution, challenging assumptions of inevitable deep tissue damage.
- Early recognition of severe HAPIs is vital for improving outcomes, prevention strategies, and resource allocation.
Aim:
To investigate outcomes of severe hospital-acquired pressure injuries including Stage 3, Stage 4, Unstageable and Suspected Deep Tissue Injuries and examine wound trajectories, patient characteristics and patterns of wound progression over time.
Materials And Methods:
We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from a 5-year cohort of hospitalised patients with severe hospital-acquired pressure injuries reported across four Australian hospitals (December 2019-November 2024). Data from a purpose-built database were entered in by Skin Integrity Leads (senior wound nurses), with wounds assessed at initial reporting, specialist review, monitoring and discharge. Associations between clinical variables and injury severity were examined using chi-square tests.
Results:
Among 388 patients (mean age 72.2 years; 63.7% male), heels were the most common injury site (53.4%). The majority of wounds were confirmed as severe at initial review. Suspected Deep Tissue Injuries were more likely to receive timely review (83.5%). By discharge, a number of Suspected Deep Tissue Injuries had resolved or were reclassified as non-severe. Factors significantly associated with severe pressure injuries included orthopaedic fractures (p = 0.034), age-related factors (p = 0.019), musculoskeletal diagnoses (p = 0.010), renal/urological comorbidities (p = 0.006), and aged/complex care specialties (p = 0.004). Mean hospital stay was 55.9 days.
Conclusion:
Older age, comorbidities, reduced mobility, and specialised care highlight high-risk groups for pressure injury risk. A number of Suspected Deep Tissue Injuries stabilised or resolved with timely assessment. These findings challenge assumptions that Suspected Deep Tissue Injury routinely indicate inevitable deep tissue damage, and reinforce that many severe pressure injuries are preventable. Early recognition can improve outcomes and inform prevention strategies, clinical practice, and resource allocation.
Related Concept Videos
Traumatic Brain Injury l: Introduction
Spinal Cord Injury ll: Pathophysiology
Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:

