Pressure injury severity and trajectory: A 5-year cohort study in an Australian health district

Michelle Barakat-Johnson1, Katja Heuer2, Darren Dela Rosa3

  • 1Nursing and Midwifery Executive Services, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Wound Care Command Centre, Sydney Virtual Hospital, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; School of Health and Human Sciences, University of Huddersfield, United Kingdom.

Insights

Severe hospital-acquired pressure injuries, including Suspected Deep Tissue Injuries, can stabilize or resolve with timely assessment. Many severe pressure injuries are preventable, emphasizing early recognition for better outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Wound care and management
  • Hospital-acquired conditions
  • Patient outcomes research

Background:

  • Severe hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs) pose significant challenges in patient care.
  • Understanding the progression and outcomes of HAPIs is crucial for effective management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate outcomes of severe HAPIs (Stage 3, 4, Unstageable, Suspected Deep Tissue Injury).
  • To examine wound trajectories, patient characteristics, and progression patterns over time.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from a 5-year cohort across four Australian hospitals.
  • Data collected by Skin Integrity Leads, including initial reporting, specialist review, monitoring, and discharge assessments.
  • Chi-square tests used to examine associations between clinical variables and injury severity.

Main Results:

  • Heels were the most common injury site (53.4%) among 388 patients (mean age 72.2 years).
  • Suspected Deep Tissue Injuries (sDTIs) were more likely to receive timely review and often resolved or were reclassified.
  • Factors associated with severe HAPIs included orthopaedic fractures, age, musculoskeletal diagnoses, renal comorbidities, and aged care specialties.

Conclusions:

  • Older age, comorbidities, reduced mobility, and specialized care identify high-risk groups for pressure injuries.
  • Timely assessment of sDTIs can lead to stabilization or resolution, challenging assumptions of inevitable deep tissue damage.
  • Early recognition of severe HAPIs is vital for improving outcomes, prevention strategies, and resource allocation.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Traumatic Brain Injury l: Introduction01:28

Traumatic Brain Injury l: Introduction

DefinitionTraumatic brain injury, or TBI, is a disturbance of normal brain function induced by an external mechanical force, such as a direct blow to the head or a penetrating injury. It can affect both brain structure and function, producing a wide range of clinical outcomes. TBI is a heterogeneous condition, meaning its effects may differ based on the type, location, and severity of the injury.Basis of ClassificationTBI is classified based on severity, injury mechanism, or pathophysiology. In...
25
Spinal Cord Injury ll: Pathophysiology01:14

Spinal Cord Injury ll: Pathophysiology

Spinal cord injury progresses through two interconnected phases: primary injury and secondary injury.Primary InjuryPrimary injury happens at the moment of trauma and involves immediate mechanical damage to the spinal cord.Compression happens when broken vertebrae, herniated discs, or accumulating blood (such as a hematoma) press directly against the spinal cord, distorting its normal shape and function. In cases of contusion, the cord is bruised by a blunt force (like penetrating injuries or...
25
Flail Chest-II01:26

Flail Chest-II

Managing flail chest, a condition characterized by a segment of the chest wall moving independently from the rest of the thoracic cage, requires a comprehensive approach. It includes a thorough assessment of the patient's condition, a diagnostic evaluation to determine the extent of the injury, and the implementation of appropriate medical interventions tailored to the individual's needs.
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:
1.0K