Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

Standardized Data Acquisition for Neuromelanin-Sensitive Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Substantia Nigra
Published on: September 8, 2021
Machine learning reveals two neuroanatomical subtypes of adolescent depression with distinct white matter,
Yihao Zhang1, Jiahui Chen1, Xiuling Tian1
1School of Psychology, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Brain Science and Mental Health, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, 250358, China.
Background:
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a clinically and neurobiologically heterogeneous disorder typically emerging in adolescence. Delineating MDD subtypes with distinguishing neurobiological substrates and clinical profiles is a promising strategy for guiding precise diagnosis and treatments.
Methods:
In this study, we included 152 adolescents with first-episode MDD and 140 demographically matched healthy controls. All participants underwent brain imaging scans and comprehensive neurocognitive assessments. Based on brain morphometric features of gray matter and subcortical volume, the Heterogeneity through Discriminative Analysis (HYDRA) was conducted to identify potential MDD subtypes. We then compared clinical characteristics, morphometric features, white matter microstructure, functional connectivity, and neurocognitive performance between the subgroups and healthy controls to elucidate the profiles of identified subtypes.
Result:
Two robust distinct neuroanatomical subtypes were identified. Subtype 1 showed widespread cortical and subcortical gray matter reduction, manifesting as decreased cortical thickness, cortical volume, surface area, and subcortical volume, along with poorer white matter integrity. Subtype 2 exhibited preserved gray matter morphology and less pronounced white matter disruptions. Moreover, both subtypes demonstrated hypo- and hyperconnectivity among the visual, sensorimotor, default mode, and attention networks, and the differences were more pronounced in subtype 2. Furthermore, both subtypes showed significant cognitive impairments, and subtype 2 specifically performed worse in reward related emotion processing.
Conclusion:
This study identified two robust subtypes of adolescent MDD with divergent brain morphology, white matter, functional connectivity and cognitive profiles, reflecting the clinical and neurobiological heterogeneity inherent in this disorder. These findings hold promises for subtype-based approaches to advance diagnosis and treatment.
More Related Videos
05:19Author Spotlight: Therapeutic Benefit of Closed-Loop Deep Brain Stimulation in Depression Treatment
Published on: July 7, 2023
10:43Developing Neuroimaging Phenotypes of the Default Mode Network in PTSD: Integrating the Resting State, Working Memory, and Structural Connectivity
Published on: July 1, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Depression: Overview
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and Symptoms
To diagnose ADHD, symptoms must manifest before age 12 and be evident across multiple settings....
Depressive Disorders: Etiology
Biological Factors in Depression
Biological predispositions significantly influence the risk of developing depressive disorders. Genetic studies highlight the role of variations in the serotonin transporter...
Human Genetics
The complex relationship between genetics and psychology is observable through common biological components such...
Cognitive Development During Adolescence
Long-term Depression
Calcium Ion Concentration Mechanism
If over...