Do Hip Precautions Matter After Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty With Capsular Repair? A Randomized Control
Aditya S Yadav1, Ajay Potluri1, Siddhartha Dandamudi1
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
The Journal of Arthroplasty
|April 29, 2026
Summary
Posterior hip precautions after total hip arthroplasty (THA) did not reduce dislocation rates. Unrestricted movement improved patient-reported outcomes without increasing complications, suggesting precautions may hinder recovery.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- The effectiveness of posterior hip precautions in preventing dislocation after posterior approach total hip arthroplasty (THA) is not well-established.
- Mobility restrictions associated with these precautions may impede patients' functional recovery and return to daily activities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether adherence to hip precautions impacts dislocation rates following primary posterior approach THA.
- To evaluate the effect of hip precautions on functional recovery and patient-reported outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, randomized study involving 1,133 patients undergoing primary posterior approach THA.
- Patients were randomized into a restricted group (hip precautions) or an unrestricted group.
- Primary outcome was dislocation; secondary outcomes included complications and patient-reported outcomes (HOOS JR).
Main Results:
- No significant difference in dislocation rates between the restricted (0.88%) and unrestricted (0.88%) groups (OR: 0.60; P=0.547).
- The unrestricted group reported statistically higher Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores Joint Replacement (HOOS JR) at six weeks and three to six months.
- No significant differences in 90-day complications or revisions were observed between groups.
Conclusions:
- Routine strict hip precautions following posterior approach THA with capsular repair did not demonstrate a reduced risk of dislocation.
- These precautions may unnecessarily limit early functional recovery, increase patient anxiety, and negatively affect patient-reported outcomes.


