Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

Author Spotlight: Semi-Automated Isolation of the Stromal Vascular Fraction from Murine White Adipose Tissue Using a Tissue Dissociator
Published on: May 19, 2023
Bone phenotype in familial partial lipodystrophy type 2: Insulin resistance and sclerostin
Hippolyte DupuiS1, Arnaud Jannin2, Lucille Van Es2
1Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology, Oncology and Metabolism, Huriez Hospital, Lille University Hospital, F-59000 Lille, France; Competence Center of Rare Diseases of Insulin-Secretion and Insulin-Sensibility, PRISIS; Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology, Oncology and Metabolism, Huriez Hospital, Lille University Hospital, F-59000 Lille, France.
Background:
The impact of insulin-resistance on bone mineral density (BMD) remains unclear. Sclerostin inhibits bone formation, and increases with ageing, metabolic syndrome, and renal failure. Genetically-determined low sclerostin levels are associated with high BMD. Our aim was to determine the bone phenotype and the influence of insulin-resistance without obesity on sclerostin levels in Familial Partial Lipodystrophy type 2 (FPLD2).
Methods:
Demographic, metabolic, anthropometric, and bone parameters were compared after adjustment on age and menopausal status across four groups of women (19 FPLD2, 12 obese with diabetes, 14 obese without diabetes, 11 lean controls).
Results:
The FPLD2 group had significantly higher Intra-Abdominal/Total-Abdominal Fat (IAF/TAF) ratio and lower fat mass percentage compared to the other groups. Glucose parameters (Fasting blood glucose, C-peptide, HbA1c, HOMA2-IRCP), and triglycerides were significantly higher in the FPLD2 group than in controls, with a higher sclerostin level. Sclerostin levels were positively associated with age, glucose parameters, Z-score, T-score, and negatively with osteocalcin. FPLD2 was the only subgroup in which the association between sclerostin and HOMA2-IRCP was maintained. In contrast, osteocalcin levels were negatively associated with age, glucose parameters, triglycerides, IAF/TAF, and bone parameters. Neither sclerostin or osteocalcin were associated with BMI, whole-body fat, or leptin.
Conclusion:
The association of sclerostin (positive) and osteocalcin (negative) with HOMA2-IRCP, but not with fat mass parameters, suggests a predominant role of insulin-resistance over fat mass in the regulation of osteokines. Insulin-resistance may uncouple the usual relationship between sclerostin and BMD. The sclerostin contribution in early atherosclerosis in FPLD2 remains to be studied.
Related Concept Videos
Type II Diabetes II: Pathophysiology
Cholesterol: Significance and Regulation
Considering cholesterol and...
Type II Diabetes I: Introduction
Type I Diabetes II: Pathophysiology
Insulin: The Receptor and Signaling Pathways

