Pharmacokinetics and safety study of methylphenidate hydrochloride sustained-release tablets in Chinese healthy
Di Zhou1, Yinxia Li1, Lijuan Ning2
1Department of Phase I Clinical Trials Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China; Anhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Pharmaceutical Preparations and Clinical Pharmacy, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Abstract:
This study aims to investigate the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties and safety of generic versus brand-name methylphenidate hydrochloride (MPH) sustained-release tablets (Concert®) under fasting and fed conditions, and to evaluate bioequivalence between the two formulations, thereby providing sufficient evidence for an abbreviated new drug application. A randomized, open-label, single-dose, four-period, fully replicated crossover bioequivalence study was conducted on healthy Chinese volunteers under fasting and fed conditions (n = 36). Eligible Participants received 18 mg test (T) or reference (R) MPH sustained-release tablets, followed by a 7-day washout interval for each period. Blood samples were collected predose through 72 h postdose. The plasma concentration of methylphenidate was analyzed by validated LC-MS/MS. Bioequivalence evaluation included Cmax, AUC0-∞. Furthermore, owing to the biphase distribution profile of this formulation attributed to the osmotic release oral system (OROS) technology, a partial AUCs (AUC0-4h,AUC4-8h ,AUC8-12h,AUC0-24h for fed and AUC0-3h,AUC3-7h,AUC7-12h,AUC0-24h for fasting condition) analysis is necessary. Under both conditions, the T and R formulations showed comparable pharmacokinetics. The geometric mean ratios with 90% confidence interval (CI) were as follows: under fasting conditions, Cmax was 91.57-101.48%, AUC0-∞ was 99.85-106.45%; under fed conditions, these values were 89.88-98.22% and 97.87-103.03%, respectively. Additionally, the partial AUCs results for both fasting and fed trials were consistent. All confidence intervals fell within the 80-125% bioequivalence range. Both formulations demonstrated good tolerability, with no serious adverse events observed. Under both fasting and fed conditions, the test formulation demonstrated bioequivalence to the reference formulation in healthy Chinese Participants. Both preparations were safe and well-tolerated.
Related Concept Videos
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
Nonlinear Pharmacokinetics: Dependence of Elimination Half-Life and Dose Clearance
A study on guinea pigs examined the...
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies
Modified-Release Drug Delivery Systems: Bioavailability


