Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
Published on: September 7, 2019
Intersoftware variability in SPECT quality control: A technical note on analytical discrepancies and compliance
Feng Jiawu1,2, Zhang Li1, Wang Shaojia1
1Hubei Provincial Hospital of Integrated Chinese & Western Medicine (Hubei Provincial Hospital for Occupational Disease), Wuhan, China.
Software variability in Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) quality control (QC) analysis impacts diagnostic reliability. Standardizing SPECT QC software is crucial for accurate equipment evaluation and consistent results across institutions.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging Physics
- Diagnostic Radiology
- Quality Assurance in Healthcare
Background:
- Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) systems require rigorous quality control (QC) for reliable diagnostic imaging.
- Current reliance on diverse third-party software for SPECT QC analysis introduces non-standardized variability.
- This variability can compromise accurate equipment performance assessment and interinstitutional comparability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the extent of variability in SPECT quality control (QC) test results arising from different image analysis software packages.
- To highlight the critical need for standardization in SPECT QC software to ensure consistent and reliable performance metrics.
Main Methods:
- Five commercial SPECT QC software packages (A-E) were utilized for analysis.
- Identical DICOM image datasets from four SPECT/CT systems were analyzed following the WS 523-2019 standard.
- Key performance indicators including file reading success, intrinsic uniformity, resolution, linearity, and compliance rates were assessed using statistical methods like ANOVA and Welch's tests.
Main Results:
- Significant variations were observed in file reading success rates (61.8%-100%) and compliance rates (68.8%-100%) across software packages.
- Statistically significant intersoftware differences were found for intrinsic integral uniformity, spatial resolution, and differential linearity.
- Large effect sizes (η² > 0.14) for spatial resolution and differential linearity indicate substantial software-driven discrepancies.
Conclusions:
- Significant disparities exist between SPECT QC software packages in file reading and performance indicator analysis.
- These software-induced differences directly affect the accuracy of equipment evaluations and interinstitutional comparability.
- Divergent conclusions on device compliance status can arise due to the use of different analysis software.
Related Concept Videos
Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS): Interferences
Instrument Calibration
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Interference
Spectral interference occurs when signals from other elements or molecules overlap with the analyte signal, falsely elevating or masking the analyte's absorbance. This interference can be corrected using Zeeman,...
Spectrophotometry: Introduction
The essential components of a spectrophotometer include a source of electromagnetic radiation, a slot for placing a material to be analyzed, and a...
IR Spectrometers
UV–Vis Spectrometers

