Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

The Terroir Concept Interpreted through Grape Berry Metabolomics and Transcriptomics
Published on: October 5, 2016
Determinants of residential pesticide contamination in vineyard regions: a structural equation modeling approach
Raphaëlle Teysseire1,2,3, Cécile Proust-Lima4, Rémi Béranger5
1Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Inserm UMR1219, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France. raphaelle.teysseire@inrs.ca.
Background:
Previous studies have associated pesticide exposure among people living near fields with adverse health outcomes. However, the factors influencing residential contamination by agricultural pesticides remain unclear.
Objective:
This study aims to assess the effect of the local environment, home characteristics, and occupant behaviors on residential contamination.
Methods:
In 2021, wipe samples from outdoor and indoor surfaces were collected in 28 homes in Bordeaux vineyard region during peak pesticide spraying. Eight fungicides were analyzed by LC-MS/MS or GC-MS/MS. Environmental, residential, and occupant-related data were gathered through questionnaires and databases. Using multilevel structural equation modeling, we simultaneously examined the effects of multiple factors on pesticide contamination outdoors (Model 1, n = 227 samples) and indoors (Model 2, n = 543 samples), reporting standardized β coefficients.
Results:
Outdoor pesticide contamination was positively associated with local vineyard areas (β = 0.79, p = <0.001) and the probability of a recent pesticide application (β = 0.34, p = 0.09). In contrast, daily wind speed (β = -0.54, p = 0.001), cumulative rainfall over the past month (β = -0.32, p = 0.03), and cleaning (β = -0.37, p < 0.001) were negatively associated with outdoor contamination. Indoor contamination was significantly associated with the annual local purchases of pesticides (β = 0.79, p < 0.001) and pesticide track-in by occupants (β = 0.16, p < 0.001). Conversely, households with active adults and children (β = -0.49, p < 0.01), cleaning (β = -0.40, p < 0.001), and surface contact frequency (β = -0.30, p < 0.001) showed significant negative associations. Air exchange exhibited only a weak suggestive association (β = 0.07, p = 0.09). Both models demonstrated good fit indices.
Significance:
These results improve our understanding of residential pesticide contamination and could help inform the design of strategies to reduce exposure in rural populations.
Impact Statement:
Residential pesticide contamination from agricultural field drift may represent an important exposure pathway in rural communities. Our study identifies key factors driving this contamination through comprehensive surface sampling both inside and outside homes near vineyards, using advanced statistical methods, such as structural equation modeling. We found that the main contributors include outdoor pesticide applications, meteorological conditions, track-in, and air exchange, while factors, such as cleaning practices and frequent contact with surfaces help mitigate contamination. These findings provide useful insights for designing targeted interventions to reduce exposure and inform public health strategies in agricultural regions.
Related Concept Videos
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Pharmacodynamic Models: Linear Concentration–Effect Model
Multiple Regression
Farmers can use multiple regression to determine the crop yield based on more than one factor, such as water availability, fertilizer, soil properties, etc. Here, the crop yield is the response or dependent variable as it depends on the other independent variables. The analysis requires the construction of a scatter plot...
Microbial Bioremediation of Pesticides
Pharmacodynamic Models: Additive and Proportional Drug Effect Model
Pharmacodynamic Models: Direct Effect Model and Indirect Response Model

