Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

Lower Limb Biomechanical Analysis of Healthy Participants
Published on: April 15, 2020
Should pre-measurement physical activity be standardized in muscle thickness and stiffness evaluations? - A
Konstantin Warneke1,2, Gerit Plöschberger3, Manuel Oraze4
1Institute of Sustainability Psychology, Leuphana University Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany. konstantin.warneke@leuphana.de.
Background:
High standardization is of crucial relevance for reliability in imaging diagnostics. When quantifying muscle properties (muscle thickness and stiffness) by ultrasound or myotonometry, internal validity can be compromised by examiner-related factors and participant biologic variability. A frequently neglected source of bias is pre-measurement activity, which may acutely alter muscle perfusion and muscle blood inflow.
Methods:
The acute influence of different physical activity routines on tissue parameters was investigated in 30 healthy participants (16 m, 14f). Ten minutes before, immediately before, immediately after and 10 min retention of cycling, jogging, calf raises or control, muscle thickness and stiffness measurements via shear wave elastography (SWE) and myotonometry were measured.
Results:
Reliability was excellent for muscle thickness (ICC = 0.94-1.00; CV = 1.7-9.1%), good-excellent for SWE stiffness (ICC = 0.68-0.97; CV = up to 26% for inter-day) and myotonometry (muscle ICC = 0.77-0.98; CV = 4.0-17% tendon 0.86-0.93 (CV = 11-17%). Muscle thickness significantly increased after calf raises (d = 1.60, 10.3%) and jogging (d = 0.60, 3.0%), without effects after cycling or control. Shear-wave elastography showed muscle stiffness decreased after calf raises (d=-0.73, -16.7%). Myotonometry indicated a stiffness increase (d = 1.04, 20.1%). The 10-minute retention showed consistent effects for muscle thickness (d = 0.80, 5.3%) and stiffness (SWE: d = 0.78, 21.1%, myotonometry: d=-0.82, -13.0%).
Conclusion:
Pre-measurement activity could systematically affect muscle thickness and stiffness with dependence on activity type and intensity. This highlights the importance of monitoring pre-measurement activity to minimize potential reliability issues as this, depending on several potential moderators, could enhance the random error if within sample pre-measurement activity is not standardized. Before ultrasound evaluation, for some activity (i.e. calf raises), > 10 min of rest was required to diminish this bias.
More Related Videos
08:40Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity
Published on: June 12, 2019
07:01Clinical Efficacy of Ultrasound-Assisted Scoliosis-Specific Exercise in Mild-Grade Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
Published on: December 2, 2025