Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

Method for Simultaneous fMRI/EEG Data Collection during a Focused Attention Suggestion for Differential Thermal Sensation
Published on: January 5, 2014
Context-Dependent Temporal Changes in Hypnotics Involved in Suicide Attempts
Taro Sasaki1, Norio Sugawara1, Motoharu Furukawa2
1Department of Psychiatry, Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine, Mibu, Tochigi, Japan.
Background:
Recent prescribing practices have shifted from benzodiazepines (BZs) toward non-GABAergic hypnotics, including dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs) and melatonin receptor agonists (MRAs). We examined whether hypnotics involved in suicide attempts changed over time in a context-dependent manner.
Methods:
We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients presenting with suicide attempts at three hospitals in Japan between April 2020 and March 2025. Hypnotics involved in attempts were identified from empty medication packages collected at presentation. Annual proportions of BZs and non-GABAergic hypnotics (OMs: DORAs and MRAs) were analyzed using Cochran-Armitage trend tests under three conditions: (1) all suicide attempts, (2) overdose-related attempts, and (3) overdose-related attempts involving a hypnotic. Additional analyses separated DORAs from MRAs.
Results:
Among 1111 suicide attempt encounters, 648 were overdose-related. OM involvement increased significantly over time across all denominators. In contrast, BZ involvement declined significantly only among overdose-related attempts. When OMs were disaggregated, DORA involvement showed a significant upward trend using overdose-related attempts as the denominator (χ2 = 7.3048, p = 0.006877) and using all suicide attempts as the denominator (χ2 = 7.6384, p = 0.005714). MRA (ramelteon) involvement did not show significant temporal change in either analysis. Overall, the increase in OM involvement was primarily attributable to DORAs.
Conclusion:
Hypnotics involved in suicide attempts changed in a context-dependent manner during the study period. The increase in non-GABAergic hypnotics was driven by DORAs, whereas reductions in BZ involvement were detectable only in overdose-related contexts. These findings suggest that evolving hypnotic availability may influence the profile of medications involved in self-poisoning.
Related Concept Videos
Sedatives and Hypnotics Drugs: Miscellaneous Agents
Melatonin congeners like ramelteon (Rozerem) and tasimelteon (Hetlioz) selectively bind to melatonin receptors (MT1 and MT2) and thus mimic the actions of melatonin, a hormone that regulates sleep-wake cycles. Tasimelteon is primarily used for non-24-hour sleep-wake disorder, common in blind patients. They are also used to treat conditions like insomnia...
Sedatives and Hypnotics: Overview
Sedative-hypnotics are categorized into barbiturates, benzodiazepines (BZDs), and non-benzodiazepines or Z-drugs. These drugs work by suppressing central nervous system activity, and this suppression is dose-dependent. Older sedative medications, like barbiturates, follow a linear curve in...
Altered States of Awareness
The ingestion of substances like stimulants or hallucinogens leads to chemical alterations in the brain...
Sedatives and Hypnotics Drugs: Barbiturates
CNS Depressants: Barbiturates and Benzodiazepines
Sedatives and Hypnotics Drugs: Benzodiazepines
Benzodiazepines work by enhancing the effects of the inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA. They bind to the GABAA receptor, increasing its affinity for GABA, which opens chloride...

