Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

The Colon-26 Carcinoma Tumor-bearing Mouse as a Model for the Study of Cancer Cachexia
Published on: November 30, 2016
Muscle Health and Prognosis in Patients With Cancer: New Insights
Emanuele Cereda1, Amanda Casirati1, Maria Cristina Gonzalez2
1Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics Unit, Fondazione IRCCS San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Background:
Reduced muscle mass and impaired composition have each been independently associated with worse outcomes in patients with cancer. However, emerging evidence suggests that reduced muscle strength-namely, dynapenia-may be particularly important for prognostication, as it is easier to assess in clinical practice compared to muscle mass. Importantly, muscle mass and composition-as assessed with computed tomography images-may not fully capture key physiological changes and/or reflect whole-body alterations, particularly in patients who remain within the normal range. We investigated the predictive power for mortality of low muscle mass and impaired composition, weight loss (WL) and low strength, as well as their combination, in a cohort of patients with cancer.
Methods:
Baseline data on muscle mass and radiodensity (Hounsfield units [HU]) at the L3 level-assessed using computed tomography-along with 6-month unintentional WL (relevant if ≥ 10% of usual body weight) and muscle strength by handgrip were pooled for 477 patients with cancer (59.1% male, mean age 61.2 ± 12.8 years) from studies conducted in Brazil, Canada and Italy. Patients were categorized by sex and body mass index-specific cutoffs for low skeletal muscle mass index, low skeletal muscle radiodensity, WL ≥ 10% and low handgrip strength. Patients were followed for at least 12 months until death or censoring.
Results:
During a median follow-up of 43 months (IQR: 28-83), 188 patients died. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no survival differences for low skeletal muscle index or low radiodensity, regardless of handgrip strength. Only WL ≥ 10% consistently identified patients with poorer prognosis, independently of low handgrip strength. Fully adjusted Cox's regression models showed an independent association only with WL (HR = 1.56 [95% CI: 1.12;2.16]; p = 0.008) and low handgrip strength (HR = 2.07 [95% CI: 1.47;2.92]; p < 0.001), as well as an increased risk for all low handgrip strength/%WL categories. Mortality risk increased across all low handgrip strength/%WL categories. Among the eight risk groups combining low skeletal muscle mass index, WL ≥ 10% and low handgrip strength, only those including WL ≥ 10% and low handgrip strength were significantly associated with higher mortality. Low skeletal muscle mass index contributed to a worse prognosis only when combined with both WL ≥ 10% and low handgrip strength. Similar results were observed when skeletal muscle radiodensity was used in replacement of skeletal muscle mass index.
Conclusions:
In patients with cancer, muscle strength and WL were stronger survival predictors than muscle mass and composition, reinforcing their relevancy as easily assessed key markers of muscle health.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
mTOR Signaling and Cancer Progression
The mTOR pathway or the...
mTOR Signaling and Cancer Progression
Tumor Progression
Colon cancer is one of the best-documented examples of tumor progression. Early mutation in the APC gene in colon cells causes a small growth on the colon wall called a polyp. With time, this polyp grows into a benign, pre-cancerous tumor. Further...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...

