Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation
Published on: June 20, 2018
Outcome Modification and Disclosure Practices in Sinonasal Clinical Trials: A Registry-Based Cross-Sectional
Kohl Kirby1, Harrison Smith1, Ty Lutze1
1Office of Medical Student Research Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences Tulsa Oklahoma USA.
Outcome modifications in inflammatory sinonasal disease trials are frequent but poorly documented. Transparency is needed for accurate interpretation of clinical trial results in rhinology research.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Trials Methodology
- Rhinology and Sinonasal Disease Research
- Evidence-Based Medicine
Background:
- Interventional trials for inflammatory sinonasal disease are critical for advancing treatment strategies.
- Prespecified outcomes in clinical trials are essential for unbiased interpretation of results.
- Understanding outcome modification patterns is key to assessing trial integrity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the frequency, nature, timing, and transparency of outcome modifications in interventional sinonasal disease trials.
- To identify factors influencing high-impact outcome modifications.
- To evaluate the documentation and disclosure of outcome changes in trial registries and publications.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of interventional trials for inflammatory sinonasal disease registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with published results.
- Comparison of earliest and latest registry versions to identify substantive outcome modifications.
- Categorization of modifications by interpretive impact and timing; assessment of disclosure in registries and publications.
Main Results:
- Outcome modifications were highly frequent (94.4%), affecting primary outcomes in 81.9% of 72 trials.
- A median of seven substantive modifications per trial occurred, often after completion or publication.
- Disclosure of modifications was rare (4.4% in registry, 1.5% in publication).
Conclusions:
- Frequent and poorly documented outcome modifications in sinonasal trials challenge interpretability.
- Enhanced transparency in reporting outcome changes is crucial for reliable evidence synthesis in rhinology.
- Standardized reporting of outcome modifications is needed to ensure the validity of clinical trial findings.
More Related Videos
08:47Symptom Assessment of Patients with Allergic Rhinitis Using an Allergen Exposure Chamber
Published on: March 3, 2023
08:33Olfactory Neurons Obtained through Nasal Biopsy Combined with Laser-Capture Microdissection: A Potential Approach to Study Treatment Response in Mental Disorders
Published on: December 4, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Blind Procedures