Developing sensitive quality indicators for ground inter-hospital transport of adult critically ill patients using
Qianqian Zhang1, Ge Zang1, Naifu Tang1
1Department of Emergency Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Background:
The complexity of inter-hospital transport (IHT) for critically ill patients poses challenges to quality evaluation. Currently, sensitive quality indicators for the entire process of IHT remain lacking. The objective of this study is to develop a set of standardized and quantifiable quality evaluation indicators for land-based IHT of adult critically ill patients.
Methods:
Based on the structure-process-outcome three-dimensional model, we developed the first-round Delphi questionnaire through literature review, semi-structured interviews, and research group discussions. We invited nursing, medical, and administrative experts in emergency medicine, critical care, and IHT from various institutions to participate in two rounds of Delphi consultation, and established the quality evaluation indicator system for IHT. The indicator weights were determined using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP).
Results:
The response rates for the two rounds of the expert Delphi questionnaire were 100 and 95.83%, respectively. The proportion of experts providing suggestions was 83.3% in the first round and 21.7% in the second round. The expert authority coefficient (Cr) was 0.950 for the first round and 0.974 for the second round. The Kendall's concordance coefficients (Kendall's W) for the third-level indicators were 0.298 (first round) and 0.327 (second round), both of which were statistically significant (p < 0.001). Through this expert consultation process, a finalized quality indicator system was established, comprising 3 first-level indicators, 10 s-level indicators, and 22 third-level indicators.
Conclusion:
The sensitive quality indicators for land-based IHT of adult critically ill patients developed in this study enable comprehensive quality monitoring of the entire transfer process through the dimensions of structure, process, and outcome. Those quality indicators provide a basis for objectively evaluating the quality of IHT, identifying weaknesses in transport practice, and improving transport quality.
More Related Videos
14:28Non-Invasive Monitoring of Microvascular Oxygenation and Reactive Hyperemia using Hybrid, Near-Infrared Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy for Critical Care
Published on: May 10, 2024
04:00Author Spotlight: Assessing Surgical Frailty with Point-of-Care Ultrasound of Quadriceps Muscles
Published on: July 26, 2024
Related Concept Videos
01:19Respiratory Assessment: Purpose and Indications
Objectives and Importance:
The primary goal of respiratory assessment is to evaluate patients at early risk of clinical deterioration. Since respiratory distress often precedes other signs of declining health, breathing patterns and sounds become a...
01:19Guidelines For Measuring Vital Signs
Before taking a patient's vital signs, a nurse would consider and assess the patient's comfort level and ensure appropriate equipment is available.