Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

Semi-Automated Planimetric Quantification of Dental Plaque Using an Intraoral Fluorescence Camera
Published on: January 27, 2023
CAD-RADS 2.0: Comparison of methods for assessment of plaque burden
Ivan Platzek1, Krzysztof Nocon1, Suela Mema1
1Dresden University Hospital, Department of Radiology, Dresden, Germany.
Insights
The agreement between coronary artery calcium (CAC) testing, segment involvement score (SIS), and visual estimate for assessing coronary plaque burden varies, with moderate to substantial agreement found between methods. The chosen method significantly influences Coronary Artery Disease-Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) results.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Radiology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Coronary artery disease (CAD) assessment relies on accurate plaque burden evaluation.
- The Coronary Artery Disease-Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) classification uses multiple methods for plaque assessment.
- Understanding the agreement between these methods is crucial for consistent reporting.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the agreement between three CAD-RADS 2.0 approved methods for coronary plaque burden assessment: coronary artery calcium (CAC) testing, segment involvement score (SIS), and visual estimate.
- To determine if these methods are interchangeable in clinical practice.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 132 patients with stable chest pain undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA).
- Independent evaluation of CCTA by two radiologists to determine plaque burden using P(CAC), P(SIS), and P(visual) estimates.
- Assessment of inter-method agreement using linearly weighted kappa statistics.
Main Results:
- The study included 132 patients (mean age 66.6 years, 68.2% male).
- Weighted Kappa values indicated moderate to substantial agreement: κ=0.56 (P(CAC) vs. P(SIS)), κ=0.67 (P(CAC) vs. P(visual)), and κ=0.72 (P(SIS) vs. P(visual)).
- CAD-RADS classifications varied based on the plaque burden assessment method used.
Conclusions:
- The choice of plaque burden assessment method significantly impacts CAD-RADS 2.0 results.
- The three methods (CAC, SIS, visual estimate) are not interchangeable and capture different aspects of plaque burden.
- It is essential to explicitly state the method used when reporting plaque burden within the CAD-RADS 2.0 framework.
Objectives:
To assess the agreement of the three methods of coronary plaque burden assessment approved by the Coronary Artery Disease-Reporting and Data System classification (CAD-RADS 2.0): coronary artery calcium (CAC) testing, segment involvement score (SIS), and visual estimate.
Methods:
Patients with stable chest pain who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and showed signs of coronary artery disease were included in the current retrospective study. The CCTAs were independently evaluated by two board-certified radiologists. Differing results were resolved in consensus. Three separate estimates of plaque burden (P) were performed for each examination: P(CAC), P(SIS) and P(visual). Linearly weighted kappa was used to assess the agreement of the three methods.
Results:
The study included 132 patients (mean age 66.6 years, 68.2% male). The mean CAC score was 503.6 ± 1023.5 [SD]. CAD-RADS was 1 in 47/132 patients (35.6%), 2 in 40/132 patients (30.3%), 3 in 18/132 patients (13.6%), 4 in 24/132 cases (18.2%) and 5 in 3/132 cases (2.3%). Weighted Kappa values for method agreement were κ= 0.56 (95% CI: 0.48-0.65) for agreement between P(CAC) and P(SIS), κ= 0.67 (95% CI: 0.59-0.75) for agreement between P(CAC) and P(visual), and κ= 0.72 (95% CI: 0.64-0.80) for agreement between P(SIS) and P(visual), signifying moderate to substantial agreement.
Conclusion:
Results for plaque burden in CAD-RADS 2.0 are clearly influenced by the choice of assessment method. When reporting plaque burden in CAD-RADS 2.0, the method of assessment should be unequivocally named, as the three proposed methods are not interchangeable and describe different aspects of plaque burden.
More Related Videos
08:02Author Spotlight: Enhanced Quantification of Cardiovascular Calcification Progression for Longitudinal Micro PET/CT Studies in Small Research Animals
Published on: November 15, 2024
09:36A Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Computational Protocol for Analysis of Plaque Morphology and Hemodynamics in Patients with Carotid Artery Stenosis
Published on: August 12, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction