Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Toward an integrated risk paradigm: personalizing antithrombotic therapy for coronary heart disease with
Ai-Lian Dong1, Xi Chen1, Yuan-Ting Qu1
1Department of Gastroenterology, Hongqi Hospital Affiliated to Mudanjiang Medical University, Mudanjiang, China.
Insights
Managing antithrombotic therapy for coronary artery disease requires integrating ischemic and bleeding risks. A new risk-integration paradigm offers a systematic approach for better long-term patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Medicine
Background:
- Antithrombotic therapy in coronary artery disease (CAD) faces a critical challenge balancing ischemic event prevention with bleeding risk.
- Current management strategies often address these risks as competing priorities, resulting in suboptimal and reactive treatment plans.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose a paradigm shift in antithrombotic therapy management for CAD.
- To advocate for a risk-integration framework that views ischemic and bleeding risks as interconnected.
Main Methods:
- This perspective article outlines a conceptual framework for risk integration.
- Key components include continuous risk assessment, mechanism-based therapeutic selection, phased management strategies, and shared decision-making between clinician and patient.
Main Results:
- The proposed risk-integration paradigm moves beyond treating risks as competing priorities.
- It reframes ischemic and bleeding risks as dynamic, interconnected elements of a patient's overall profile.
Conclusions:
- A systematic and individualized approach to antithrombotic therapy in CAD is achievable through risk integration.
- This paradigm shift aims to optimize long-term clinical outcomes by holistically managing patient risks.
Abstract:
The management of antithrombotic therapy in coronary artery disease has long been constrained by the tension between preventing ischemia and provoking bleeding. Current approaches often treat these risks as competing priorities, leading to reactive and unstable treatment plans. This perspective article argues for a fundamental shift toward a risk-integration paradigm, which re-conceptualizes ischemic and bleeding risks as interconnected components of a unified, dynamic patient profile. By adopting a framework of continuous assessment, mechanism-based therapy, phased management, and shared decision-making, this paradigm offers a systematic and individualized strategy for optimizing long-term clinical outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Anticoagulant Drugs: Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants
Warfarin, a prominent vitamin K antagonist family member, exerts its effect by inhibiting the enzyme VKORC1 (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1). By hindering this enzyme, warfarin...
Atherosclerosis III: Management