Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

Method of Studying Palatal Fusion using Static Organ Culture
Published on: September 19, 2015
Evaluation of Speech Outcomes in Children with Cleft Palate Following Primary Single-Stage Palatoplasty
Nina Wijnants1, Tim F P Ritzen1, Maud J M Verbeek2
1Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Cleft Team, Maastricht University Medical Centre, MosaKids Children's Hospital, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Objective:
To evaluate speech outcomes in children with cleft palate following single-stage closure of the soft and hard palate.
Design:
A retrospective cohort study.
Setting:
Tertiary cleft care center at Maastricht University Medical Center+ (MUMC+), the Netherlands.
Patients, Participants:
A total of 47 children with cleft palate or cleft lip and palate who underwent single-stage palatal closure between 2011 and 2018. Children with syndromes associated with significant cognitive or developmental impairment precluding valid speech assessment were excluded.
Interventions:
Primary palatal repair using two-flap palatoplasty, Furlow double-opposing Z-plasty, or von Langenbeck technique.
Main Outcome Measures:
Speech was assessed using the Dutch Cleft Speech Evaluation Test (DCSET) and the Dutch version of the Cleft Audit Protocol for Speech - Augmented (CAPS-A). Secondary outcomes included prevalence of otitis media with effusion (OME) and tympanostomy tube placement.
Results:
Speech intelligibility improved significantly at the final assessment (median score 2 to 1; P<0.001). No significant changes were found in voice, hypernasality, hyponasality, nasal emission, nasal turbulence, or grimace. CAPS-A analysis showed resolution of palatalisation errors, but increased dentalisation/interdentalisation, likely reflecting temporary compensatory articulation. OME was present in 90.7% of children, and 97.6% required at least one tympanostomy tube.
Conclusion:
Single-stage palatal closure leads to improved speech intelligibility with stable outcomes across other speech parameters. High prevalence of middle ear disease underscores the need for multidisciplinary follow-up.

