Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

Author Spotlight: Developing Cost-Effective and Customizable Balloon Tags for Fish Passage Studies
Published on: October 13, 2023
The Economics of Mitigating Flexible Hydropower: A Systematic Review
Nusrat Jahan Bipa1,2, Giuseppe Roberto Pisaturo3, Terese E Venus4
1Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Faculty of Engineering, via Bruno Buozzi 1, Bolzano, Italy.
None:
Flexible hydropower is essential for integrating variable renewables, yet its short-term flow fluctuations (hydropeaking) can result in negative ecological impacts and, when mitigated, financial losses for operators. As balancing these impacts with energy system flexibility represents a key policy challenge for sustainable energy transitions, we conduct a systematic review of the economic dimensions of hydropeaking mitigation using the PRISMA methodology. We identify 35 studies and find that operational mitigation measures (e.g., ramping restrictions, minimum flows) can be effective in reducing ecological stress but may also reduce revenue by 1-8%, depending on market conditions and the perceived severity of the constraints. Structural mitigation measures, such as re-regulation reservoirs and compensation basins, lead to better ecological effectiveness by buffering flow variability, while also maintaining long-term economic feasibility, particularly when designed for multipurpose use. Emerging new hybrid mitigation measures, especially hydro-battery energy storage systems, exhibit potential to balance ecological objectives with system flexibility and market profitability. While some mitigation measures reduce hydropower revenues, several studies indicate that the associated environmental improvements can generate broader economic benefits for society, potentially resulting in net welfare gains. Additionally, the review highlights recent methodological advances used to assess economic trade-offs in hydropeaking mitigation contexts. Overall, environmental externalities associated with hydropeaking are often not fully internalized in market outcomes, with implications for hydropower regulation and market design. Policy frameworks such as environmental flow regulations, compensation mechanisms, and targeted support for mitigation infrastructure may help internalize environmental externalities and incentivize hydropower operation that balances system flexibility with river ecosystem protection.
Related Concept Videos
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Design Example: Creating a Hydraulic Model of a Dam Spillway
Fast Decoupled and DC Powerflow
Energy Considerations in Open Channel Flow
The Power Flow Problem and Solution
Net Change Theorem

