Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration in Patients with a Previous History of Biliary Tract Surgery
Published on: February 10, 2023
Development and validation of 'Gallbladder-CBD diameter-Age-Liver function score' to determine the need for
Aditya Kale1, Mayur Satai1, Suprabhat Giri1
1Department of Gastroenterology, Seth G. S. Medical College and KEM Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, 400 012, India.
Background And Aims:
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) can detect significant pathologies in patients with unexplained common bile duct (CBD) dilatation. The aim was to develop and validate a scoring system to identify patients likely to have 'actionable findings (AF)' and will be benefited by EUS examination.
Methods:
Endoscopic ultrasound database was analyzed from January 2018 to January 2022 to identify patients who underwent EUS for unexplained CBD dilatation (derivation cohort; n = 142). From February 2022 to January 2024, patients were prospectively recruited (validation cohort; n = 230). Demographics, clinical presentation, liver function test (LFT) and imaging findings were noted. Unexplained CBD dilatation was defined as dilated CBD without demonstrable cause on abdominal ultrasound, computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Actionable findings, defined as those conditions requiring endoscopic or surgical intervention, were noted. Logistic regression was used to determine predictors of AF. Prediction model was developed using nomogram and validated in the validation cohort.
Results:
AF were detected in 57.54% and 50.86% in derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. On multi-variate regression, abnormal gallbladder, p = 0.026, OR = 3.21, CBD diameter = 9-12 mm, p = 0.023, OR = 3.47; CBD diameter = > 12 mm, p = 0.004, OR = 18.0; age > 55 years, p = 0.001, odds ratio (OR) = 7.1 and abnormal LFT, p < 0.0005, OR = 15.82 (GCAL score) predicted AF on EUS. Risk scores were assigned to predictors using nomogram. Nomogram performed well in terms of discrimination with area under curve 0.904, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.854-0.954, p < 0.001. At cut-off value of 10.90, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of 94.18%, 58.92%, 77.88% 86.84% and 80.28% were obtained in derivation cohort. In validation cohort, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of 95.97%, 83.96%, 90.43%, 87.5% and 94.68% were observed.
Conclusion:
EUS can detect 'actionable findings' in patients with unexplained CBD dilatation. 'GCAL score' provides a simple validated risk stratification tool, which can help in selecting patients for EUS examination.
More Related Videos
04:03Application of Laparoscopic Ultrasonography in Primary Choledochal Suture during Combined Two-lens Surgery
Published on: March 28, 2025
07:44Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biliary Drainage: Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy in Malignant Biliary Obstruction
Published on: March 25, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):
Gallbladder
The gallbladder's anatomy consists of three regions: the fundus, body, and neck. Extending from the neck, the cystic duct joins...
Cholecystitis
Endoscopic Procedures V: ERCP
Patient...
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.