Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 3, 2026

Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions
Published on: June 21, 2019
Evaluating Whether Icons and Visual Elements Help or Hinder Understanding of Key Information for Research Studies:
Mary C Politi1, Clara N Lee2, Eliana C Goldstein1
1School of Public Health, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Objective:
Informed consent forms for research are often lengthy and complex. One way to improve consent forms is to clarify the key information page required for federally funded research in the United States. We developed a visual key information page using color, plain language, bulleted text, and icons. In formative studies, the visual key information page was positively received, but some asked whether icons improve outcomes or distract from information. This study tested whether icons affect knowledge, satisfaction, or engagement with study information.
Methods:
We recruited English-speaking, U.S.-based adults through Prime Panels. Participants were randomized to view one of three versions of a key information page about a hypothetical biobank study: Version A used bulleted, plain language text organized in boxes, incorporating icons and visual elements; Version B was identical but with no icons or other visual elements; Version C displayed identical plain language text only. We measured participants' intention to join the study, decisional conflict about choice intention, knowledge of study details, satisfaction with the information, and engagement with the information. Finally, they viewed all versions and reported their preference among the three and their attitudes about icons in Version A.
Key Results:
A total of 453 participants responded; we analyzed 422 valid responses. There were no significant differences in outcomes by version (all p values > .05), including when stratifying by health literacy. After viewing all versions, most (69.4%) preferred Version A over other versions. In addition, most liked the icons (78.2%), found them helpful (74.2%) and did not find them distracting (77%).
Conclusions:
Although participants preferred icons and visual elements over text alone, icons and visual elements did not affect knowledge, satisfaction, or engagement with study information. Future research will investigate whether and how visual key information enhances text-based consent forms in a multisite randomized trial with ongoing studies.
More Related Videos
07:12Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
Published on: April 11, 2025
05:58Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
Published on: August 29, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Blinding
Statistical Significance
Blind Procedures
What is an Experiment?