Outcomes of Carotid Endarterectomy versus Transcarotid Artery Revascularization in Patients with Significant Cardiac
Aidin Baghbani1, Harleen K Sandhu1, Akiko Tanaka1
1Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth Houston, Houston, TX.
Insights
Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) are safe options for high-risk cardiac patients undergoing carotid revascularization. Both procedures demonstrate comparable long-term survival and stroke-free outcomes in this population.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <30% or persistent arrhythmia face elevated risks during carotid revascularization.
- Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is standard, but transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) offers a less invasive alternative.
- Comparative outcomes of CEA versus TCAR in high-risk cardiac patients are not well-defined.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare perioperative and long-term outcomes of CEA and TCAR in patients with severe cardiac comorbidities.
- To evaluate the safety and durability of both revascularization methods in a high-risk population.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of CEA and TCAR procedures (December 2015 - August 2025).
- High cardiac risk defined as LVEF <30% and/or persistent arrhythmia.
- Comparison of baseline demographics, perioperative variables, and outcomes using stratified and survival analyses.
Main Results:
- 405 of 2,466 patients (16.4%) met high-risk criteria (200 CEA, 205 TCAR).
- High-risk patients were older and had higher rates of coronary artery disease and anticoagulant use.
- No significant differences in perioperative stroke, myocardial infarction, or 30-day mortality between CEA and TCAR in high-risk patients. Long-term survival and stroke-free outcomes were also comparable.
Conclusions:
- CEA and TCAR provide similar perioperative and long-term results for patients with severe cardiac comorbidities.
- Both procedures are safe and durable options for carotid revascularization in this high-risk group.
Background:
Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <30% or persistent arrhythmia are often considered at elevated risk for carotid revascularization. While carotid endarterectomy (CEA) remains standard, transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) has emerged as a less invasive alternative. Comparative outcomes of these procedures in high-risk cardiac patients remain poorly defined.
Methods:
A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database identified all CEA and TCAR procedures performed between December 2015 and August 2025. High cardiac risk was defined as LVEF <30% and/or persistent arrhythmia. Baseline demographics, perioperative variables, and outcomes were compared using stratified and survival analyses.
Results:
Among 2,466 patients, 405 (16.4%) met high-risk criteria (CEA: n = 200; TCAR: n = 205). Compared with low-risk patients, the high-risk cohort was older (75.4 vs. 71.7 years, P < 0.01) and had higher rates of coronary artery disease (64.4% vs. 42.0%, P < 0.01) and anticoagulant use (39.4% vs. 5.6%, P < 0.01). Blood loss was greater with CEA than TCAR (50 vs. 25 mL, P < 0.01) but similar across risk groups. Among high-risk patients, perioperative ipsilateral stroke (1.0% vs. 2.4%), myocardial infarction (1.0% vs. 0.5%), and 30-day mortality (1.5% vs. 2.4%) did not differ between CEA and TCAR. The median follow-up was 20 months after CEA and 11 months after TCAR, with no difference in long-term survival or stroke-free outcomes (Gray's test P = 0.35).
Conclusion:
In patients with severe cardiac comorbidities, CEA and TCAR offer comparable perioperative and long-term results. Both represent safe and durable options for carotid revascularization in this high-risk population.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
