Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 3, 2026

Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
Published on: January 15, 2017
Micro- and Macroaggressions Experienced by Physicians and Trainees: A Nationwide Qualitative Study
Cynthia Kay1, Jennifer A Woodard2, Natalie Yass3
1Department of Medicine, Clement J. Zablocki VA Medical Center and Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
Objectives:
Most of the literature on micro- and macroaggressions from the perspectives of physicians and learners derives almost exclusively from surveys and focus groups. A more thorough understanding of individual perspectives is necessary to further advance this subject. The objective of this study was to explore physicians' and physician trainees' experiences with micro- and macroaggressions in the clinical setting and their thoughts on how to address such aggressions.
Methods:
This was a nationwide, qualitative study. Virtual one-to-one interviews were conducted between October 2021 and March 2022. A volunteer sample of 18 faculty physicians and trainees (medical students, residents, and fellows) representing all regions of the United States were interviewed. Grounded theory was used to analyze transcripts and create a code book. Codes were finalized through constant comparison and developed into themes and subthemes.
Results:
Thirteen participants identified as female. Eight were non-White. Eleven were faculty. All levels of learners were included. The average interview duration was 43 minutes. Participants described a wide range of aggressions, their resultant emotions and thoughts in response to an event, the complexity of addressing aggressions, and their self-reflection on what transpired and their roles within medicine and society.
Conclusions:
Most participants, regardless of level, felt responsible to respond to micro- and macroaggressions when individuals more junior to them were present. Most also admitted feeling unprepared and unsure of how to respond, however.
Insights
Physicians and trainees often feel responsible for addressing micro- and macroaggressions but lack preparedness. This qualitative study explored their experiences and strategies for managing these challenging workplace interactions.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Qualitative Research
- Workplace Dynamics
Background:
- Existing literature on micro- and macroaggressions in medicine primarily relies on surveys and focus groups.
- A deeper understanding of individual physician and trainee perspectives is crucial for advancing this field.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore physicians' and physician trainees' lived experiences with micro- and macroaggressions in clinical settings.
- To investigate their perspectives on effective strategies for addressing these aggressions.
Main Methods:
- Nationwide qualitative study utilizing virtual one-to-one interviews.
- Conducted between October 2021 and March 2022 with 18 volunteer faculty physicians and trainees across the U.S.
- Grounded theory approach for transcript analysis, including codebook development and thematic analysis.
Main Results:
- Participants detailed a spectrum of aggressions experienced and their emotional/cognitive responses.
- The complexity of addressing aggressions and participants' self-reflections on their roles were highlighted.
- Diverse experiences were reported across different levels of training and faculty positions.
Conclusions:
- A majority of participants felt a responsibility to intervene in micro- and macroaggressions, especially when junior colleagues were present.
- However, most participants acknowledged feeling unprepared and uncertain about how to effectively respond to such incidents.
More Related Videos
14:32Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
12:22Mindfulness in Motion MIM: An Onsite Mindfulness Based Intervention MBI for Chronically High Stress Work Environments to Increase Resiliency and Work Engagement
Published on: July 1, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Obedience
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Microenvironments
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Factors Affecting Illness
For instance, risk factors are connected to illness,...
Ethics in Research