Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 3, 2026
Simulator Training for Endovascular Neurosurgery
Published on: May 6, 2020
Does Residency Rank List Placement Predict Clinical Performance in Interventional Radiology Training?
Oussama Metrouh1, Julie Bulman1, Sarah Schroeppel DeBacker2
1Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center / Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (O.M., J.B., M.A., J.W.).
Rationale And Objectives:
This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between Interventional Radiology (IR) trainees' clinical performance during residency and their final National Residency Matching Program (NRMP) rank order list (ROL) placement during the match application, and to identify application metrics predictive of strong clinical performance.
Materials And Methods:
A retrospective review of application data for IR residents and fellows graduating from a single academic center between 2020-2025 was conducted. Metrics included United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) scores, number of clinical and research experiences, peer-reviewed publications, abstracts, awards and the final placement on the ROL. A structured survey aligned with Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) milestones was designed and distributed to faculty who directly worked with each trainee but were not involved in the program's NRMP rank order list formation to evaluate their clinical performance during IR training. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and a composite clinical score was calculated. Associations between application metrics, NRMP rank, and clinical performance were evaluated using Spearman correlation and univariate linear regression.
Results:
Moderate inter-rater reliability was observed for medical knowledge (ICC=0.60, p < 0.001), procedural competence (ICC=0.50, p < 0.001), and patient care (ICC = 0.50, p = 0.004). No significant correlation was found between NRMP rank list placement and clinical performance (Spearman ρ = 0.07, p = 0.82). USMLE Step 2 score was the only significant predictor of clinical performance (β = 0.17, p = 0.01), with the greatest separation observed at a cutoff score of 239.
Conclusion:
These findings suggest that interview-driven rank placement may not reliably identify high-performing residents, whereas Step 2 scores may provide better predictive value for clinical performance during IR training.
More Related Videos
04:09Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: October 10, 2018
05:31Transradial Access Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients
Published on: September 20, 2020
Related Concept Videos
01:30Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ventilation Perfusion Scans are two radiological investigations that offer detailed diagnostic images of the body, particularly lung structures.
MRI
MRI uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency signals to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. This technology provides a more detailed diagnostic image than CT scans, enabling it to characterize pulmonary nodules, stage bronchogenic carcinoma, and evaluate inflammatory activity in...
01:30Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT
01:02Ranks
01:13Radiological Investigation III: Pulmonary Angiogram and PET Scan
Pulmonary Angiogram
A Pulmonary Angiogram is an invasive procedure involving injecting a contrast medium through a catheter threaded into the pulmonary artery or the right side of the heart to visualize the pulmonary vasculature. Computed Tomography (CT) scans have mainly replaced this...