Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 3, 2026

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital
Published on: June 11, 2012
Improving Glycemic Control Through Population-Based Strategies: A Case-Control Study Within a Large Health System
Taynara Formagini1,2, Minyong Kim3, Xing Wei4
1Department of Research & Evaluation, Division of Health Services Research and Implementation Science, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA. taynara.x.formagini@kp.org.
Background:
Nearly half of US adults with type 2 diabetes fail to achieve glycemic control (A1c < 7%), increasing complication risks. The American Diabetes Association recommends system-level strategies to optimize care delivery, yet the real-world impact of population-based programs on A1c control remains unclear.
Objective:
To examine the association between three components of a diabetes management program and attainment of target A1c in patients with type 2 diabetes, as well as the relationship between encounter frequency and target A1c.
Design:
This retrospective nested case-control study utilized data from Kaiser Permanente Southern California (2017-2022).
Participants:
Patients with type 2 diabetes and baseline A1c ≥ 7%. Cases (two consecutive A1c < 7% within 2 years) were matched to controls based on baseline A1c and follow-up duration.
Main Measures:
The primary exposure variable was predominant encounter type: (1) primary care physician (PCP), (2) population care management (PCM), and (3) Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES). The secondary exposure variable was encounter frequency. Conditional logistic regression assessed the independent effects of predominant encounter type on A1c, adjusting for covariates.
Key Results:
The sample consisted of 317,284 patients (94,647 cases), with a median age of 59 years, and 49% Hispanic. Patients with DSMES as their predominant care had higher odds of achieving A1c target (OR 1.39, 95%CI 1.35, 1.42), while those with predominantly PCM encounters had lower odds of achieving A1c target (OR 0.78, 95%CI 0.77, 0.80), compared to PCP-led care. Findings were consistent across racial and ethnic minority groups. The odds of achieving A1c control increased with encounter frequency up to 9-14 visits but diminished beyond this threshold, particularly at 25+ encounters.
Conclusions:
Further resources devoted to enhancing the reach and effectiveness of DSMES may help more patients living with diabetes achieve sustained glycemic control and prevent complications.
Related Concept Videos
Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy
Insulin remains the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with type 1 and many...
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Type II Diabetes I: Introduction
Type II Diabetes II: Pathophysiology
Hyperglycemia
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Biguanides and Glitazones

