Local application of otoprotective compounds other than sodium thiosulfate to prevent cisplatin-induced hearing loss:

Amirhossein Masroor1, Nienke Streefkerk1, Martine Van Grotel1

  • 1Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Drug Delivery
|May 2, 2026
PubMed

Insights

Cisplatin-induced hearing loss (CIHL) is a serious side effect in children undergoing cancer treatment. This review found no local otoprotective agents currently proven to be as safe and effective as systemic sodium thiosulfate (STS) for preventing CIHL in pediatric patients.

Area of Science:

  • Ototoxicology
  • Pediatric Oncology
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Cisplatin-induced hearing loss (CIHL) significantly impacts pediatric cancer survivors' quality of life.
  • Systemic sodium thiosulfate (STS) is approved for otoprotection in children, but faces implementation challenges.
  • Limited evidence exists for local STS or alternative otoprotective agents in pediatric populations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the efficacy and safety of locally administered non-STS otoprotective agents for preventing CIHL in pediatric patients.
  • To summarize investigated drug delivery methods and administration routes for local otoprotection.
  • To identify potential future pediatric implementations of local otoprotective strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review of preclinical (in vivo) and clinical studies on locally applied non-STS otoprotective agents.
  • Categorization of agents by biological mechanism (anti-inflammatory, chemical deactivators, etc.).
  • Analysis of investigated drug delivery methods and administration routes.

Main Results:

  • 70 preclinical and 8 clinical studies were identified, investigating 45 different agents.
  • Dexamethasone and N-acetylcysteine showed preclinical efficacy and progressed to clinical trials.
  • Clinical trials indicated limited or not clinically relevant benefits for dexamethasone and N-acetylcysteine, and no local alternatives reliably replaced systemic STS.

Conclusions:

  • Currently, no local otoprotective agents demonstrate sufficient safety and efficacy to replace systemic STS for pediatric CIHL prevention.
  • Further research is essential to optimize dosage, delivery methods, and timing for local otoprotective agents.
  • Investigating novel local drug delivery systems is crucial for future pediatric otoprotection strategies.