Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 3, 2026

Preoxygenation Techniques for Tracheal Intubation in Critically Ill Adults Utilizing Oxygen Mask and Noninvasive Ventilation
Published on: December 5, 2025
Effects of Endotracheal Suctioning With Expiratory Pause in Infants
Ana Paula Dattein Peiter1,2, Taila Cristina Piva3, Taciana Fassbinder Piccoli3
1Ms. Dattein Peiter is affilaited with Department of Physical Therapy, Hospital da Criança Conceição, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Insights
Closed-system suctioning with an expiratory pause effectively removed more secretions in infants. However, this technique also increased driving pressure and inspiratory resistance, requiring careful consideration during pediatric intensive care unit procedures.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Intensive Care
- Respiratory Physiology
- Critical Care Medicine
Background:
- Endotracheal suctioning is a standard procedure in pediatric ICUs.
- Closed-system suctioning offers ventilatory benefits but may be less effective for secretion removal.
- An expiratory pause technique is an alternative for closed-system suctioning.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of closed-system endotracheal suctioning with an expiratory pause versus conventional closed suctioning.
- To evaluate the volume of suctioned secretions, respiratory mechanics, and hemodynamic parameters.
- To assess the impact of the expiratory pause technique on infant ventilation.
Main Methods:
- A randomized crossover pilot trial involving infants on invasive mechanical ventilation.
- Infants underwent both conventional closed suctioning and closed suctioning with an expiratory pause, with a 2-hour interval between techniques.
- Evaluated parameters included secretion volume, respiratory mechanics (compliance, resistance, driving pressure), and hemodynamic variables.
Main Results:
- The expiratory pause technique yielded significantly more suctioned secretions (1.4g vs 1.1g).
- An increase in driving pressure and inspiratory resistance was observed after suctioning with an expiratory pause.
- No significant differences were found in hemodynamic parameters between the two techniques.
Conclusions:
- Closed-system suctioning with an expiratory pause is more effective for removing secretions in infants.
- The technique leads to increased driving pressure and inspiratory resistance, necessitating careful monitoring.
- This method offers potential benefits for secretion clearance in mechanically ventilated infants.
Background:
Endotracheal suctioning is a routine procedure in the pediatric ICU (PICU) and can be performed via open or closed systems. Closed-system suctioning has benefits for pressure maintenance in the ventilatory system and oxygen supply during the technique but is less effective. The association of an expiratory pause in closed-system suctioning is an alternative technique. We sought to evaluate the volume of suctioned secretions, respiratory mechanics, and hemodynamic parameters during closed endotracheal suctioning with expiratory pause, compared with conventional closed suctioning.
Methods:
Randomized crossover pilot trial with infants receiving invasive mechanical ventilation >24 h, with neuromuscular blocker, without cough reflex, randomized to define the order of suctioning techniques (T1-technique 1 conventional suctioning without expiratory pause; T2-technique 2: with expiratory pause), performed with a 2-h interval. Evaluated hemodynamic parameters (heart rate, blood pressure, and peripheral arterial oxygen saturation), respiratory mechanics (static and dynamic compliance, inspiratory and expiratory resistance, driving pressure), and suctioning secretion were weighed on a precision balance. Shapiro-Wilk test for normally distributed variables analysis and generalized estimating equation for effect analysis.
Results:
Ten infants were included with a median age of 2 months (1.0-3.7). The amount of secretions from the technique with expiratory pause was significantly higher compared with conventional suctioning (mean 1.4 g vs 1.1 g; P < .001). Treatment effect was observed in the analysis of driving pressure (P < .001) and inspiratory resistance (P = .02), with an increase in these variables after suctioning with expiratory pause. There were no significant differences in hemodynamic variables.
Conclusions:
The closed-system suctioning with expiratory pause was more effective in secretion removal compared with conventional closed suctioning. However, driving pressure and inspiratory resistance increased after suctioning with an expiratory pause.
More Related Videos
06:22Surfactant Depletion Combined with Injurious Ventilation Results in a Reproducible Model of the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ARDS
Published on: April 7, 2021
04:16Inspiratory Muscle Training as an Adjunct to the Treatment of Weaning Failure in Critically Ill Patients: A Practical Guide
Published on: January 30, 2026
Related Concept Videos
Suctioning the Nasopharyngeal Airway
Equipment Required
Endotracheal Tube Extubation
Procedure
Extubation removes the endotracheal tube (ETT) from the patient on mechanical ventilation. It requires a well-coordinated, multidisciplinary approach involving physicians, nurses, respiratory therapists, and other healthcare professionals....
Tracheostomy Suctioning I: Pre-Procedural Steps
Equipment Required
First, gather all necessary equipment: a sterile suction catheter, a sterile disposable container, sterile gloves, a towel or...
Pulmonary Cycle: Exhalation
Suctioning the Oropharyngeal Airway
After assembling the equipment, the nurse should practice hand hygiene and don appropriate PPE according to infection control guidelines to avoid the...
Tracheostomy Suctioning II: Procedure