Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

Intraoperative Ultrasound in Spinal Surgery
Published on: August 17, 2022
The Chitranjan S. Ranawat Award: Surgeon-Performed, Intraoperative Adductor Canal Blocks are Non-Inferior to
Brent Benavides1, Arianne Charlebois2, Geoffrey Dervin3
1Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Division of Orthpaedic Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Background:
For total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed in an ambulatory setting, reliable analgesia is essential for same-day discharge (SDD). Although adductor canal blocks (ACBs) are effective, access to anesthesiologist-performed ACBs (aACBs) may be limited by regional anesthesia availability in resource-constrained centers. Even when expertise exists, lack of perioperative workflow integration can reduce efficiency, prolong procedural time, and increase costs. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether surgeon-performed ACBs (sACBs) are non-inferior to aACBs regarding time to discharge, perioperative outcomes, and patient-reported outcome measures.
Methods:
A prospective randomized controlled trial of 200 SDD TKA patients was conducted. Participants were randomized to receive preoperative aACB or intraoperative sACB. The primary outcome was time from spinal anesthetic reversal to discharge. The secondary outcomes included Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), 24-hour morphine milligram equivalent use, SDD failure, 24-hour readmission, and patient-reported outcome measures at baseline and two weeks postoperatively. Power analysis used a representative SDD TKA sample detecting a 15% difference in the primary outcome (power 80%, α = 0.05).
Results:
Time to discharge was not different in sACB compared to aACB: 209.5 minutes (range, 10 to 510) compared to 231.1 (range, 59 to 455), P = 0.06. Secondary outcomes showed no significant differences: NPRS at baseline, 4.3 (aACB) versus 4.3 (sACB), P = 0.87; and NPRS at discharge, 2.4 (aACB) versus 2.9 (sACB), P = 0.07. The 24-hour opioid consumption was 35.8 morphine milligram equivalent (aACB) versus 43.6 (sACB), P = 0.31. There were no 24-hour readmissions. There were 13 patients who failed SDD: eight (aACB) versus five (sACB), P = 0.42.
Conclusions:
The sACBs were non-inferior to aACBs for outpatient TKA. An sACB represents a safe alternative that may reduce reliance on limited anesthesia resources. With standardized perioperative integration, sACB may improve operating room efficiency and reduce costs.
More Related Videos
08:50Deep Neuromuscular Blockade Leads to a Larger Intraabdominal Volume During Laparoscopy
Published on: June 25, 2013
09:51The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Spinal Anesthesia
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Intravenous Regional Anesthesia
One of the advantages of...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Surface, Infiltration, and Conduction Block Anesthesia
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Epidural Anesthesia
Since epidural anesthetics can be infused through an epidural catheter, all types of drugs, including short-acting ones, can be administered. Chloroprocaine and lidocaine are examples of short and long-duration anesthetics, respectively. Bupivacaine...
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Pharmacological Actions
Although all competitive neuromuscular blockers are designed...
Depolarizing Blockers: Pharmocokinetics