Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

03:14
Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
Published on: December 6, 2024
1.3K
Accuracy of large language model-based artificial intelligence tools for equine topics.
S Aldworth-Yang1, S J Coleman1, K O'Reilly1
1Department of Animal Sciences, College of Agricultural Sciences, Colorado State University, 350 W Pitkin Street, Fort Collins, Colorado 80521, USA.
Journal of Equine Veterinary Science
|May 2, 2026
Summary
Artificial intelligence (AI) platforms show potential for equine information but struggle with complex topics. While capable of answering basic questions, their accuracy and thoroughness vary, falling short of expert knowledge.
Area of Science:
- Equine Science
- Artificial Intelligence Applications
Background:
- Artificial intelligence (AI) platforms are increasingly utilized for equine information retrieval.
- These platforms synthesize data from diverse sources, often without differentiating between factual information and opinion.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the accuracy and quality of AI-generated responses to equine-related queries.
- To test the hypothesis that AI platforms excel at basic equine questions but falter on complex subjects.
Main Methods:
- Forty equine-related questions were developed across five categories: general care, facilities, nutrition, genetics, and reproduction.
- Questions were classified by difficulty (beginner, intermediate, advanced, trending) and posed to three AI platforms: ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, and ExtensionBot.
- Responses were scored on accuracy, relevance, thoroughness, and source quality (maximum 20 points each).
Main Results:
- AI platform performance varied significantly by question difficulty, topic, and platform.
- ChatGPT and Microsoft Copilot demonstrated higher accuracy and relevance compared to ExtensionBot.
- Intermediate-level questions received the highest overall scores, while complex topics presented challenges for AI accuracy and thoroughness.
Conclusions:
- AI platforms can serve as supplementary resources for equine information but do not currently match the expertise of Equine Extension Specialists.
- AI performance is inconsistent, particularly when addressing intricate equine subjects, highlighting areas for improvement.
