Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
ChatGPT in Public Cardiovascular Healthcare: Accuracy, Limitations, and Implications
Lara Borja Mialarett1, Thiago Lott Bezerra1, Manuela Carneiro Lopes1
1Faculdade de Ciências Médicas de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brasil.
Introduction:
ChatGPT is a cost-effective artificial intelligence (AI) tool designed to facilitate virtual interactions with humans, and its application in healthcare is expanding. However, research on ChatGPT's effectiveness in public healthcare, particularly for cardiac patients, is still limited. This study aims to evaluate ChatGPT's potential in managing cardiovascular health for patients with acute or chronic cardiac conditions.
Methods:
We analyzed real medical records from 'The Cardiovascular Care' program, affiliated with a university outpatient clinic. ChatGPT's performance was evaluated in terms of its ability to analyze clinical cases, propose diagnoses, and recommend appropriate actions. We also assessed whether ChatGPT's accuracy and errors varied depending on disease severity, rarity, mortality risk, and urgency.
Results:
When compared to physicians' records, ChatGPT provided correct responses in 43% of diagnostic hypotheses, 5% of recommended supplementary exams, and 10% of laboratory tests. It showed significant accuracy and discernment in diagnosing conditions influenced by factors such as severity, rarity, risk of death, and urgency. However, this discernment did not extend to recommendations for supplementary exams and laboratory tests. Interestingly, while ChatGPT's responses in these areas were often only partially accurate, they tended to be more detailed, sometimes unnecessarily so, than those provided by physicians. Diagnostic hypotheses from multiple models, including ChatGPT Health, DeepSeek, Gemini Pro, Perplexity AI, and ESC Chat, were also evaluated. Performance varied across models, with ChatGPT demonstrating the highest diagnostic accuracy among those assessed, despite still producing incorrect outputs.
Conclusion:
Although ChatGPT demonstrates some diagnostic capability, its overall reliability remains questionable, with performance at times approaching random chance. Caution is advised when considering its use in clinical decision-making.
Related Concept Videos
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System I: Subjective Data
Initial Enquiry
Ask the patient about their primary concern and thoroughly explore all reported symptoms.
Medical History
Investigate past illnesses affecting the cardiovascular system, such as angina, anemia, rheumatic fever, congenital heart disease, stroke, thrombophlebitis, dysrhythmias, varicosities
Inquire about symptoms...
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT

