A comparison of monocyte-derived macrophages with and without prior CD14+ magnetic sorting
Julia Thomé1, Johannes Zeller1, Thierry Christmann1
1Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Introduction:
For in vitro studies involving macrophages, an efficient protocol for isolation and cell culture of monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM) is essential. However, it remains unclear how far isolation steps improve purity or provoke cell changes. Here we compare the characteristics and functionality of macrophages isolated from leukocyte reduction (LRS) chambers by either CD14+ magnetic sorting (sMac) or by seeding PBMC with separation by plastic adhesion and subsequent washing steps (uMac) to evaluate the necessity of magnetic sorting.
Methods:
PBMC were isolated from LRS chambers using density gradient centrifugation. sMac were enriched from PBMC by magnetic separation removing lymphocytes, uMac were seeded and separated from lymphocytes via plastic adhesion and washing steps. Both groups were plated under matched conditions to allow monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation after adhesion. Morphology, purity, cell viability, surface marker expression, and cytokine production upon stimulation were assessed using flow cytometry, qPCR, brightfield and confocal microscopy.
Results:
MDM were successfully cultured from both uMac and sMac in over 75%. Cell viability was similar between uMac (54%) and sMac (48%). CD14 expression was significantly higher in sMac (89.48%) compared to uMac (65.91%), the mean fluorescence intensity of CD14 did not differ significantly. No significant differences were found in CD80 and CD163 expression, nor in the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines upon stimulation.
Conclusions:
LRS chambers serve as a valid source for culturing of MDM with high reliability and yield. Since both methods produced macrophages of comparable phenotype and function, our findings indicate that magnetic CD14+ sorting is not mandatory for most in vitro applications.
Insights
Magnetic sorting is not essential for isolating monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM) from leukocyte reduction system (LRS) chambers. Both magnetic sorting (sMac) and plastic adhesion (uMac) methods yield comparable MDM purity, viability, and function for in vitro studies.
Area of Science:
- Immunology
- Cell Biology
Background:
- Efficient isolation of monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM) is crucial for in vitro studies.
- The impact of isolation methods on MDM purity and cellular changes requires clarification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the characteristics and functionality of MDM isolated using CD14+ magnetic sorting (sMac) versus plastic adhesion (uMac) from leukocyte reduction system (LRS) chambers.
- To evaluate the necessity of magnetic sorting for MDM isolation.
Main Methods:
- Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were isolated from LRS chambers via density gradient centrifugation.
- MDM were cultured using either magnetic separation (sMac) or plastic adherence (uMac) for lymphocyte removal.
- Morphology, purity, viability, surface marker expression (CD14, CD80, CD163), and cytokine production were assessed.
Main Results:
- Both sMac and uMac methods yielded MDM with over 75% purity and comparable cell viability.
- sMac showed significantly higher CD14 expression, but mean fluorescence intensity did not differ.
- No significant differences were observed in CD80/CD163 expression or pro-inflammatory cytokine production.
Conclusions:
- Leukocyte reduction system (LRS) chambers are a reliable source for culturing high-yield MDM.
- Magnetic CD14+ sorting is not mandatory for most in vitro applications, as plastic adhesion yields comparable macrophage phenotype and function.
More Related Videos
08:37Reprograming Model of Human Monocyte-derived Macrophages for In-vitro Assays
Published on: April 18, 2025
14:15Preparation of Myeloid Derived Suppressor Cells MDSC from Naive and Pancreatic Tumor-bearing Mice using Flow Cytometry and Automated Magnetic Activated Cell Sorting AutoMACS
Published on: June 18, 2012
