Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
Published on: July 24, 2016
Geodiversity and resilience: A scoping review
Maija Toivanen1, Daniel Santos2, Aleksi Räsänen3
1Geography Research Unit, University of Oulu, P.O. BOX 8000, 90014, Oulu, Finland. maija.toivanen@oulu.fi.
Abstract:
Resilience thinking has become central to addressing environmental and societal challenges, yet it focuses primarily on ecological and social dimensions while physical foundations remain underrepresented. This systematic scoping review examined 90 geodiversity and geoheritage studies (2012-2025) analysing connections to resilience concepts. While most reviewed studies lack explicit resilience frameworks, they demonstrate extensive implicit resilience engagement, particularly through maintaining diversity and redundancy, managing slow variables, encouraging learning, and broadening participation. Geodiversity enriches resilience thinking by treating physical environments not as passive backdrops but as active participants in system change, and by bridging natural and social dimensions that are typically managed separately. Three interrelated barriers limit integration of resilience and geodiversity: disciplinary communities remain disconnected, evidence emphasizes description over mechanisms, and institutional infrastructure for geodiversity governance lags behind that for biodiversity. Overcoming these barriers through collaborative efforts could ground resilience thinking in the geological reality that underlies all sustainability challenges.
Related Concept Videos
Applications of GIS: Disaster Management and Emergency Response
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Levels of Use of a GIS
Biodiversity and Human Values
Responses to Drought and Flooding
Habitat Fragmentation

