Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Standardized Model of Ventricular Fibrillation and Advanced Cardiac Life Support in Swine
Published on: January 30, 2020
Injury Patterns in Resuscitated Non-Traumatic Cardiac Arrest Patients-A Comparative CT Analysis Between Automated
Simon Viniol1, Lennart Scholand1, Alexander König1
1Clinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps-University Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043 Marburg, Germany.
Abstract:
Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine differences in injury types and frequencies between piston-based and band-based automated chest compression devices in patients with non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) at a German cardiac arrest center. Methods: This retrospective single-center study assessed resuscitation-related injuries in OHCA patients using protocol-based early whole-body CT scans at hospital admission. CT scans were reviewed independently by two reviewers blinded to the compression device used. Between May 2015 and September 2021, all patients resuscitated from non-traumatic OHCA, treated with a mechanical chest compression device, and showing stable return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) until CT examination according to the institutional standard operating procedure for all OHCA patients were included. Patients were categorized by compression device type, and group differences were analyzed using the Chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U test. In addition, patient-level incidences of rib fracture types were calculated, and risk ratios with corresponding 95% confidence intervals were used to compare rib fracture patterns between groups. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Among 71 patients, 32 received band-based and 39 piston-based treatment. Both groups were comparable in resuscitation duration, body constitution, and gender ratio, although the band-based group was older. Thoracic injuries predominated, with rib fractures representing the most frequent injury pattern (64/71, 90.1%). The median number of rib fractures per patient was 10 (IQR 8-12) in the band-based group and 9 (IQR 7-12) in the piston-based group. The band-based group had significantly more liver lacerations (5/32, 15.6% vs. 0/39, 0%; p = 0.01) and displaced rib fractures (117 vs. 87; p = 0.046; patient-level RR = 1.43, 95% CI 1.06-1.93). Conclusions: In this observational study of a CT-based cohort of OHCA patients with stable ROSC, the band-based device was associated with significantly higher frequencies of liver lacerations and displaced rib fractures than the piston-based device. These findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating and may support further evaluation of device-specific injury profiles in future studies.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies

