Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
A Study on the Establishment of Diagnostic Reference Levels for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventional
Daeho Kim1,2, Jungsu Kim3
1Medical Convergence Radiologic-Technology, Department of Bio-Health Convergence, Graduate School of Health Technology, Daegu Health College, Daegu 41453, Republic of Korea.
Insights
This study established institutional Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) for cardiovascular interventions, finding that procedure complexity significantly impacts radiation dose and fluoroscopy time. These findings support optimizing patient safety guidelines.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Cardiovascular Interventions
- Radiation Safety
Background:
- Cardiovascular interventions necessitate prolonged fluoroscopy, elevating patient radiation exposure risks.
- Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) are crucial benchmarks for optimizing radiation doses.
- National DRLs were released in Korea in March 2025, prompting the need for institutional DRL establishment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish institutional DRLs at a tertiary center.
- To evaluate local radiation dose optimization against national and international standards.
- To assess the impact of procedure complexity on radiation dose and fluoroscopy time.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 1663 DICOM Radiation Dose Structured Reports from 2022-2024.
- Evaluation of total kerma-area product and fluoroscopy times for categorized procedures.
- Establishment of institutional DRLs at the 75th percentile, adhering to International Commission on Radiological Protection guidelines.
Main Results:
- Institutional DRLs were established, with total kerma-area product ranging from 23.43 Gy·cm² (coronary angiography) to 329.45 Gy·cm² (chronic total occlusion interventions).
- Procedure complexity, such as multivessel PCI and acute myocardial infarction, significantly increased radiation burden and fluoroscopy times.
- Fluoroscopy contributed more to radiation dose than cine imaging in moderate-complexity interventions.
Conclusions:
- The established institutional DRLs provide a benchmark for local radiation dose optimization.
- Findings support the development of institutional safety guidelines for high-complexity cardiovascular procedures.
- Enhanced patient protection is achievable through targeted optimization strategies based on procedure complexity.
Abstract:
Background/Objectives: Cardiovascular interventions require prolonged fluoroscopy, which increases the risk of radiation. Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs), set at the 75th percentile of the dose distribution, are vital benchmarks for dose optimization. Following the release of national DRLs by the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency in March 2025, this study established institutional DRLs at a tertiary center to evaluate local optimization against national and international standards. Methods: This study analyzed radiation doses from 2022 to 2024 using DICOM Radiation Dose Structured Reports data from a single center's angiography system. The total kerma-area product values and fluoroscopy times were evaluated across the categorized procedures. Following the International Commission on Radiological Protection guidelines, institutional DRLs were established at the 75th percentile of the dose distribution to benchmark against national and international DRLs. Results: Analysis of 1663 radiation dose structured reports established institutional DRLs, with the total kerma-area product ranging from 23.43 Gy·cm2 for coronary angiography to 329.45 Gy·cm2 for chronic total occlusion interventions. Complexity significantly increased the radiation burden; multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention and acute myocardial infarction nearly doubled the doses and fluoroscopy times in single-vessel interventions. Although the diagnostic procedures were cine image-driven, for moderate-complexity interventions, the contribution of fluoroscopy was greater. Conclusions: These findings support institutional optimization and development of safety guidelines to enhance patient protection during high-complexity cardiovascular procedures.
More Related Videos
07:25Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
06:16Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Imaging Studies VII: Vascular Imaging
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Radiological Investigation III: Pulmonary Angiogram and PET Scan
Pulmonary Angiogram
A Pulmonary Angiogram is an invasive procedure involving injecting a contrast medium through a catheter threaded into the pulmonary artery or the right side of the heart to visualize the pulmonary vasculature. Computed Tomography (CT) scans have mainly replaced this...
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization