Beyond Principles: A Reflective-Cognitive Framework for Ethical Decision-Making in Anorexia Nervosa

Anorexia nervosa is a clinically complex and ethically challenging psychiatric disorder. Clinicians are frequently confronted with ethical dilemmas arising from conflicts between core ethical principles in everyday clinical practice. Professional codes of ethics and legal frameworks often fail to provide a stable basis for resolving these dilemmas due to the fluctuating medical risk and the ego-syntonic nature of anorexia nervosa. Under conditions of heightened responsibility and medical risk, clinicians' cognitive and emotional responses may be activated and may mediate ethical decision-making. Although such internal processes have been described in the literature, limited attention has been paid to their role in shaping ethical judgment in routine clinical care. The aim of this article is to conceptualize the decision-making processes that unfold in response to ethical dilemmas in the clinical context of anorexia nervosa and propose a sequential multi-level framework. A focused conceptual literature review was conducted to develop a reflective framework for clinical practice, drawing on selected studies in clinical ethics, healthcare law, anorexia nervosa care, and cognitive theory. Clinicians' internal cognitive and emotional processes play a significant role in ethical decision-making in complex clinical contexts such as anorexia nervosa and should be explicitly recognized and brought into reflective awareness through supervision and reflective practice. Ethical decision-making is therefore conceptualized as a dynamic process linking clinical events, clinicians' internal responses, ethical and legal considerations, and reflective clinical judgment. Incorporating structured reflection into clinical, educational, and supervisory settings may support more ethically informed and context-sensitive clinical judgment within multidisciplinary eating disorder services.