Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Biocontained Carcass Composting for Control of Infectious Disease Outbreak in Livestock
Published on: May 6, 2010
Reducing Antimicrobial Resistance in Poultry Carcasses Extends Beyond Farm-Level Interventions
Valentina Indio1, Yitagele Terefe Mekonnen1, Chiara Oliveri1
1Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, Ozzano dell'Emilia, 40064 Bologna, Italy.
Raising chickens without antimicrobials did not reduce antimicrobial resistance (AMR) gene abundance on carcasses. Post-harvest processing stages appear to compromise farm-level AMR reduction efforts in poultry production.
Area of Science:
- Food Science
- Microbiology
- Animal Science
Background:
- Antimicrobial use in poultry farming is a significant driver of antimicrobial resistance (AMR).
- Reducing antimicrobial use in livestock is a key strategy to mitigate AMR spread.
- The impact of antimicrobial-free farming on carcass microbiome and AMR profiles requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effect of raising chickens without antimicrobials on poultry carcass microbiome composition and antimicrobial resistance gene abundance.
- To compare the microbiome and AMR profiles of caeca and carcass samples from antimicrobial-free chickens.
- To identify potential sources of AMR contamination during post-harvest processing.
Main Methods:
- Shotgun metagenomic sequencing of 151 caeca and neck skin samples from antimicrobial-free chickens.
- Bioinformatic analysis to characterize microbial communities and identify antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs).
- Comparative analysis of microbiome composition and ARG abundance between caeca and carcasses.
Main Results:
- Chicken caeca were dominated by Bacillota and Bacteroidota, while carcasses by Pseudomonadota.
- Carcass microbiomes showed enrichment in genes for adaptation to limited nutrients and oxidative stress.
- Antimicrobial resistance gene abundance was significantly higher (approx. 49% more) on carcasses than in caeca, with a predominance of multidrug efflux systems and clinically relevant genes.
Conclusions:
- Reducing antimicrobial use at the farm level may not be sufficient to lower AMR on poultry carcasses.
- Post-harvest processing stages can introduce or concentrate antimicrobial resistance genes, potentially compromising farm-level interventions.
- Further research into post-harvest interventions is crucial for effective antimicrobial resistance reduction in the poultry supply chain.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
Biological Methods for Microbial Control
Antimicrobial Effectiveness
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
Microorganisms in Agriculture and Food industry
Gene Regulation in Microbial Communities: Quorum Sensing

