Gene-Specific Outcomes After Central Nervous System Metastases in Germline BRCA1- and BRCA2-Associated Breast Cancer
Alice Decaminada1, Raute Sunder-Plassmann2, Weang-Kee Ho3,4
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Abstract:
Background: Many studies evaluating central nervous system (CNS) metastases in breast cancer (BC) combine germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers, limiting gene-specific interpretation. We evaluated gene-specific overall survival (OS) after CNS metastasis and time to CNS involvement. Methods: We retrospectively identified BC patients with confirmed CNS metastases (1995-2022) from the Medical University of Vienna and the kConFab consortium. Germline status was classified as gBRCA1 PV, gBRCA2 PV, or non-carrier. Primary endpoint was OS from CNS metastasis diagnosis; secondary endpoint was CNS metastasis-free interval from primary BC diagnosis. Kaplan-Meier/log-rank tests were used for group comparisons. Multivariable Cox models assessed OS in complete cases, stratified by molecular subtype and adjusted for prognostic factors. Sensitivity analyses included subtype-adjusted and time-period models. Results: Among 115 patients (gBRCA1 n = 32, gBRCA2 n = 18, and non-carriers n = 65), median OS differed by germline status (p = 0.019): 20.0 months (95% CI 6.7-60.0) for gBRCA2 versus 7.1 months (95% CI 3.7-10.0) for gBRCA1 and 7.6 months (95% CI 3.4-12.0) for non-carriers. In subtype-stratified analyses, gBRCA1 showed similar mortality to non-carriers (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.49-1.64, p = 0.730), while gBRCA2 showed a lower but non-significant hazard (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.18-1.25, p = 0.131). Median CNS metastasis-free interval was longer for gBRCA2 (8.4 years) versus gBRCA1 (3.0 years) and non-carriers (3.1 years; p = 0.020). Sensitivity analyses were consistent. Conclusions: gBRCA2 carriers demonstrated longer unadjusted OS after CNS metastasis and a longer CNS metastasis-free interval compared with gBRCA1 carriers and non-carriers. However, these associations were attenuated and not statistically significant after adjustment, and should therefore be interpreted as hypothesis-generating. These findings supports further investigation of gene-specific CNS disease trajectories in larger cohorts.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
Cancer-Critical Genes I: Proto-oncogenes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...


