Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Factorial Design02:01

Factorial Design

13.1K
Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
13.1K
Factors Affecting Illness01:18

Factors Affecting Illness

5.4K
When a person's physical, emotional, intellectual, social development or spiritual functioning is compromised, this deviation from a healthy normal state is called illness. Illness creates stress that in turn harms individuals. Irritation, anger, denial, hopelessness, and fear are behavioral and emotional changes an individual experiences in the phases of illness. A variety of factors influence a person's health and well-being.
For instance, risk factors are connected to illness,...
5.4K
One-Way ANOVA01:18

One-Way ANOVA

11.5K
One-way ANOVA analyzes more than three samples categorized by one factor. For example, it can compare the average mileage of sports bikes. Here, the data is categorized by one factor - the company. However, one-way ANOVA cannot be used to simultaneously compare the sample mean of three or more samples categorized by two factors. An example of two factors would be sports bikes from different companies driven in different terrains, such as a desert or snowy landscape. Here, two-way ANOVA is used...
11.5K
Surveys02:16

Surveys

14.3K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
14.3K
Two-Way ANOVA01:17

Two-Way ANOVA

2.5K
The two-way ANOVA is an extension of the one-way ANOVA. It is a statistical test performed on three or more samples categorized by two factors - a row factor and a column factor. Ronald Fischer mentioned it in 1925 in his book 'Statistical Methods for Researchers.'
The two-way ANOVA analysis initially begins by stating the null hypothesis that there is an interaction effect between the two factors of a dataset. This effect can be visualized using line segments formed by joining the...
2.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Occupational Depression Inventory performs well in Norway.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Do 9-month-old infants prefer prosocial others? Two conceptual replications and a meta-analysis of the Hamlin & Wynn box opening/closing paradigm.

Child development·2026
Same author

Pattern integration and differentiation: Dual process model of episodic memory.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025
Same author

Inferior and Middle Longitudinal Fasciculus and Fornix Support Allocentric Representation.

Hippocampus·2025
Same author

Atypical brain structure mediates reduced IQ in young adults born preterm with very low birth weight.

NeuroImage·2022
Same author

Cortical Thickness Changes After Computerized Working Memory Training in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Frontiers in aging neuroscience·2022
Same journal

An Eye-Tracking Study on Text Accessibility and Comprehension in University Students.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

The Relationship Between Physical Activity, Social Support, and Life Satisfaction Among Female College Students: A Variable- and Person-Centered Analysis.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Shifting the Blame: How Narrative Framing, Coercive Strategies, and Rape Myth Acceptance Distort Perceptions of Sexual Assault and Fuel Victim Blame.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

An AI Perspective on Counseling Supervision.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Symbolic Participation or Substantial Learning Behavior? A PSM-Based Comparison Between Honors and Non-Honors Undergraduates from Two Top Elite Universities in China.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Literacy Profiles in Twice-Exceptional Preadolescents with Intellectual Giftedness and Dyslexia.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 5, 2026

Brain Morphology of Cannabis Users With or Without Psychosis: A Pilot MRI Study
07:30

Brain Morphology of Cannabis Users With or Without Psychosis: A Pilot MRI Study

Published on: August 18, 2020

8.4K

Factors Associated with AI Use in a Norwegian Sample.

Sebastian Oltedal Thorp1, Lars M Rimol1, Martine Klock Fleten1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7034 Trondheim, Norway.

Behavioral Sciences (Basel, Switzerland)
|May 4, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Higher education, knowledge-intensive jobs, and perceived strengths-based leadership (SBL) correlate with increased workplace artificial intelligence (AI) use. Other factors like age and general training showed no association in this Norwegian study.

Keywords:
AI useNorwayartificial intelligenceeducationgenderlogistic regressionstrengths-based leadershipworkplace

More Related Videos

Generalized Psychophysiological Interaction PPI Analysis of Memory Related Connectivity in Individuals at Genetic Risk for Alzheimer's Disease
09:38

Generalized Psychophysiological Interaction PPI Analysis of Memory Related Connectivity in Individuals at Genetic Risk for Alzheimer's Disease

Published on: November 14, 2017

14.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 5, 2026

Brain Morphology of Cannabis Users With or Without Psychosis: A Pilot MRI Study
07:30

Brain Morphology of Cannabis Users With or Without Psychosis: A Pilot MRI Study

Published on: August 18, 2020

8.4K
Generalized Psychophysiological Interaction PPI Analysis of Memory Related Connectivity in Individuals at Genetic Risk for Alzheimer's Disease
09:38

Generalized Psychophysiological Interaction PPI Analysis of Memory Related Connectivity in Individuals at Genetic Risk for Alzheimer's Disease

Published on: November 14, 2017

14.4K

Area of Science:

  • Organizational Psychology
  • Technology Adoption
  • Workplace Studies

Background:

  • Artificial intelligence (AI) integration in the workplace is rapidly increasing.
  • Understanding factors influencing employee AI adoption is crucial for effective implementation.
  • Previous research often focuses on technical aspects, with less attention to organizational and leadership factors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate predictors of self-reported workplace artificial intelligence (AI) use among Norwegian employees.
  • To examine the association of demographic, job-related, and leadership variables with AI adoption.
  • To explore the role of perceived strengths-based leadership (SBL) in explaining AI use.

Main Methods:

  • Cross-sectional survey of 196 Norwegian employees.
  • Hierarchical logistic regression analysis.
  • Variables included education, job sector, gender, age, leadership role, perceived SBL, work training, and work engagement.

Main Results:

  • Higher education, male gender, employment in knowledge-intensive sectors, and higher perceived strengths-based leadership (SBL) were significantly associated with increased odds of AI use.
  • Age, leadership role, general work training, and work engagement were not significantly associated with AI use.
  • Perceived SBL emerged as a potentially important organizational factor.

Conclusions:

  • Organizational context, particularly perceived strengths-based leadership (SBL), may significantly influence workplace artificial intelligence (AI) adoption.
  • Findings suggest that factors beyond individual demographics and job sectors are relevant to understanding AI use.
  • Results are tentative due to the study's exploratory nature, cross-sectional design, and reliance on self-reported data.