Exploratory Multi-Level Analysis of the HIF Axis in Clear-Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma and Evaluation of GN44028 as an

Piotr M Wierzbicki1, Agnieszka Rybarczyk1, Mateusz Czajkowski2

  • 1Department of Histology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-210 Gdańsk, Poland.

Insights

Nuclear HIF activation in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) correlates with aggressive disease and poor survival. While HIF inhibitors show potential, further research is needed to establish therapeutic selectivity and clinical relevance in ccRCC treatment.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Cancer Research

Background:

  • Clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) exhibits constitutive activation of hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs) due to VHL loss, driving tumor progression and treatment resistance.
  • Current VEGFR-targeted therapies for ccRCC have limitations, necessitating exploration of alternative therapeutic strategies targeting the HIF pathway.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the biological and therapeutic relevance of the HIF axis in ccRCC.
  • To assess the correlation between nuclear and cytoplasmic HIF1A and EPAS1/HIF2A expression and clinicopathological parameters, including survival.
  • To evaluate the functional effects of HIF pathway inhibitors and sunitinib in ccRCC cell lines.

Main Methods:

  • Immunohistochemistry was used to assess HIF1A and EPAS1/HIF2A expression in patient tumors.
  • In vitro studies utilized ccRCC cell lines (VHL-mutant and VHL-wild-type) and non-malignant cells to analyze the effects of HIF inhibitors (GN44028, KC7F2, FM19G11) and sunitinib.
  • Assays included SRB viability, cell cycle analysis, wound closure, and RT-qPCR of HIF-related genes.
  • TCGA-ccRCC data from advanced-stage patients were analyzed for transcriptomic context.

Main Results:

  • Nuclear HIF1A and EPAS1/HIF2A expression, but not cytoplasmic, was associated with advanced stage and shorter cancer-specific survival.
  • GN44028 demonstrated the most significant antiproliferative effect and suppressed HIF-related transcription broadly.
  • Sunitinib treatment led to increased expression of selected HIF-related genes, while GN44028 lacked clear selectivity over non-malignant cells.

Conclusions:

  • Nuclear HIF activation is linked to aggressive ccRCC biology.
  • Further investigation into broader HIF pathway modulation is warranted for ccRCC treatment.
  • Clinical findings are exploratory, and therapeutic selectivity and translational relevance of HIF inhibitors require further establishment.

Related Concept Videos