Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Author Spotlight: Overcoming Anti-VEGF Resistance Through Advanced Vascular Morphology Assessment in Choroidal Neovascularization
Published on: August 11, 2023
Psychometric Assessment of the Metamorphopsia Questionnaire in Patients with Macular Diseases Receiving Anti-Vascular
Francis W B Sanders1, Jennifer H Acton2, Barbara Ryan2
1Department of Ophthalmology, Prince Philip Hospital, Hywel Dda University Health Board, Llanelli SA14 8QF, UK.
Abstract:
Background: The metamorphopsia questionnaire (MeMoQ) is an established patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) in the context of macular disease. However, its performance has not been proved in those being treated for various macular conditions with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (Anti-VEGF). The objective was to eliminate misfitting items, enhance measurement precision, and ensure optimal response categorisation. Methods: Rasch analysis was performed iteratively on 2286 responses from patients with macular diseases being treated with Anti-VEGF to optimise the MeMoQ. Fit statistics, reliability indices, person and item separation measures, and principal component analysis (PCA) of residuals were assessed to determine the optimal model. This study was conducted in an outpatient clinic specialising in retinal diseases in Hywel Dda University Health Board. Results: Misfitting items were removed in successive iterations, leading to optimised category probability curves and stable fit statistics for the MeMoQ. The resulting model for all responses included two final items, with person separation remaining inadequate reducing from 1.23 to 1.12 and reliability from 0.60 to 0.56. Category probability curves demonstrated good ordering of response variables with Andrich thresholds separated by >1.2 logits. In the subgroups of neovascular age-related macular degeneration and diabetic macular oedema person separation remained below two and reliability remained low. Conclusions: Rasch analysis demonstrated that the MeMoQ was not a valid or reliable PROM in this patient population. Therefore, the MeMoQ may not provide a reliable index of patient's perception and visual experience when undergoing Anti-VEGF treatment.
Insights
The Metamorphopsia Questionnaire (MeMoQ) is not a reliable tool for patients receiving anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (Anti-VEGF) treatment for macular diseases. Rasch analysis indicated poor validity and reliability for this patient-reported outcome measure.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
- Psychometrics
Background:
- The Metamorphopsia Questionnaire (MeMoQ) is a standard patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for macular diseases.
- Its validity and reliability in patients undergoing anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (Anti-VEGF) therapy for macular conditions are not well-established.
Purpose of the Study:
- To optimize the Metamorphopsia Questionnaire (MeMoQ) using Rasch analysis.
- To improve item fit, measurement precision, and response categorization for patients receiving Anti-VEGF treatment.
Main Methods:
- Iterative Rasch analysis was applied to 2286 patient responses from a retinal disease outpatient clinic.
- Fit statistics, reliability, person/item separation, and principal component analysis of residuals were assessed to refine the MeMoQ.
Main Results:
- Iterative item removal optimized category probability curves and fit statistics.
- The final MeMoQ model had two items, but person separation (1.12) and reliability (0.56) remained inadequate.
- Subgroup analyses for neovascular age-related macular degeneration and diabetic macular edema also showed low reliability and insufficient person separation.
Conclusions:
- Rasch analysis indicated that the MeMoQ is not a valid or reliable PROM for patients undergoing Anti-VEGF treatment for macular diseases.
- The MeMoQ may not accurately reflect patient perception and visual experience in this specific therapeutic context.

