Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

A Surgical Model of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction in Tibetan Minipigs
Published on: February 18, 2022
Predicting Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure with Mildly Reduced/Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: A
Mauro Feola1, Federico Landra1, Cosimo Angelo Greco2
1Cardiology Division, Regina Montis Regalis Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Locale Cuneo 1 (ASLCN1), 12084 Mondovì, Italy.
Insights
Sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is not well understood. While some drugs show no benefit, dapagliflozin may reduce SCD in HFpEF patients with prior reduced ejection fraction.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Sudden cardiac death (SCD) accounts for a significant portion of mortality in heart failure (HF), particularly in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
- Data on SCD risk and ventricular arrhythmias in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) are limited.
- The incidence of investigator-reported ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) is 0.3% per person/year, suggesting an annual SCD rate of approximately 1.3% in the studied population.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the risk factors and incidence of SCD in patients with HFpEF.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of specific medications (gliflozins, finerenone) in preventing SCD in HFpEF.
- To explore novel methods for predicting SCD in HFpEF patients.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of patient data to identify risk factors for SCD, including age, gender, diabetes, myocardial infarction history, left bundle branch block (LBBB), and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels.
- Clinical trials comparing the incidence of SCD in HFpEF patients treated with gliflozins and finerenone versus placebo.
- Assessment of SCD rates in patients with heart failure with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF) treated with dapagliflozin.
Main Results:
- A subgroup of HFpEF patients characterized by specific clinical and biomarker profiles exhibited a higher 5-year cumulative incidence of sudden death (SD) of 11%.
- Neither gliflozins nor finerenone demonstrated a significant reduction in SCD incidence compared to placebo in HFpEF patients.
- Dapagliflozin use was associated with a significantly lower rate of SCD in HFimpEF patients (those with prior LVEF < 40%).
Conclusions:
- Arrhythmic SCD in HFpEF may be more frequently driven by bradyarrhythmia than VT/VF.
- Current drug therapies have not yet demonstrated a clear benefit in preventing SCD in the HFpEF population.
- Emerging techniques like cardiac magnetic resonance, myocardial scintigraphy, genetic assessment, and electrophysiologic studies show promise for SCD prediction in HFpEF.
Abstract:
Cardiac arrest is a way of demise of patients who are affected by heart failure (HF), being more frequent in those with HF with a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF), and is, as such, responsible for 30-50% of cardiac death. Specific data on the risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) related to HF with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and HF with a mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) are lacking, as well as data regarding ventricular arrhythmias in this population. Considering the 0.3% person/year incidence rate of investigator-reported ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF), the rate of SCD in the analyzed population seems to be 1.3% per year. Age, gender, history of diabetes and myocardial infarction, left bundle branch block (LBBB) on electrocardiogram (ECG), and a natural logarithm of N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), identified a subgroup of HFpEF patients with a higher risk (5-year cumulative incidence of 11%) of sudden death (SD). In HFpEF patients, both glifozins and finerenone did not demonstrate a beneficial effect on SCD incidence in comparison to placebo. A significantly lower rate of SCD emerged in patients who were treated with dapaglifozin (10 vs. 26 pts) among patients with HF with an improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF), who were defined as patients with a previous left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 40%. Promising methods discussed include cardiac magnetic resonance, myocardial scintigraphy, genetic assessment, and electrophysiologic studies for predicting SCD in those patients. In conclusion, arrhythmic SCD in HFpEF patients should not be considered merely as an effect of VT/VF; bradyarrhythmia is probably more frequent and dangerous. The effects of drugs in preventing SCD in HFpEF have not been demonstrated yet.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
