Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy for Remnant Gastric Cancer
Published on: October 31, 2025
Nutritional Risk in Patients Admitted to Medical Oncology Departments: Prevalence, Associated Factors and Clinical
Francisco Javier Teigell Muñoz1,2, Laia Llobera Rius1,3, Laura Medina Ortega1,4
1Co-Management and Consultative Medicine Working Group, Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (SEMI), 28008 Madrid, Spain.
Abstract:
Background/Objectives: Malnutrition and nutritional vulnerability are common in patients with cancer and are associated with adverse clinical outcomes, particularly among hospitalised patients. However, data specifically describing nutritional risk in patients admitted to medical oncology departments remain limited. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of nutritional risk at hospital admission and to evaluate factors associated with nutritional risk and its clinical consequences. Methods: The REGIO registry is a national multicentre prospective cohort including adult patients with solid tumours admitted to medical oncology departments in 17 Spanish hospitals between February 2024 and January 2025. Nutritional risk was assessed within the first working day of hospitalisation using the Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST), with a score ≥ 2 indicating nutritional risk. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with nutritional risk and its association with prolonged hospital stay and mortality. Results: A total of 1229 patients were included (median age 67.8 years; 59% male; 64% metastatic disease). Nutritional risk was identified in 53% of patients. In multivariable analysis, poorer functional status, tumour progression, recent exposure to cytotoxic chemotherapy, and tumour types with higher nutritional impact were independently associated with nutritional risk. Patients at nutritional risk had longer hospital stays (median 10 vs. 7 days; p < 0.001), a higher likelihood of prolonged hospitalisation (adjusted OR 1.38), and increased mortality at 30 days (adjusted OR 1.63) and 60 days after discharge (adjusted OR 1.53). Conclusions: In this large multicentre cohort, nutritional risk was highly prevalent and independently associated with worse clinical outcomes, supporting the clinical relevance of systematic nutritional screening at hospital admission in patients with cancer.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Factors Influencing Drug Absorption: Disease States and Pharmacology
Substances such as alcohol and specific drugs, including antineoplastics, can also negatively impact drug absorption. For instance,...
