Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Hepatic Fibrosis Diagnosis Using Magnetic Resonance Elastography and AI
Published on: July 21, 2023
Performance of Serum-Based Non-Invasive Fibrosis Scores Compared with Liver Biopsy in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis
Umut Devrim Binay1, Faruk Karakeçili1, Orçun Barkay1
1Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University, 24100 Erzincan, Türkiye.
Insights
Non-invasive serum fibrosis scores show modest accuracy for assessing liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. FIB-4 and APRI scores offer better discrimination and correlate with histological activity, serving as potential screening tools.
Area of Science:
- Hepatology
- Gastroenterology
- Biomarkers
Background:
- Accurate liver fibrosis assessment is crucial for managing chronic hepatitis B (CHB).
- Liver biopsy, the gold standard, is invasive and not routinely used.
- Non-invasive serum fibrosis scores offer an alternative but have variable performance in CHB.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the diagnostic performance of multiple serum-based non-invasive fibrosis scores against liver biopsy in CHB patients.
- To evaluate the association of these scores with histological activity.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study of 219 CHB patients undergoing liver biopsy.
- Calculation of various non-invasive fibrosis scores (APRI, FIB-4, AAR, API, GPR, Lok, Forns, ALBI, RDW-based indices).
- Comparison of diagnostic performance using ROC analysis and AUC; correlation with histological activity index (HAI) assessed via Spearman correlation.
Main Results:
- FIB-4 showed the highest AUC for predicting significant (≥F2) and advanced (≥F3) fibrosis.
- No significant differences were found between FIB-4 and other scores for significant fibrosis (p > 0.05).
- APRI and FIB-4 demonstrated the strongest correlations with HAI and highest diagnostic accuracy for moderate-to-severe activity.
Conclusions:
- Serum-based non-invasive fibrosis scores have comparable, yet modest, diagnostic performance for biopsy-confirmed fibrosis in CHB.
- FIB-4 and APRI show relatively better discrimination and may serve as screening or rule-out tools.
- Clinical application of APRI and FIB-4 requires caution due to moderate discriminatory capacity, despite associations with histological activity.
Abstract:
Background and Objectives: Accurate assessment of liver fibrosis is essential for treatment decisions in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Although liver biopsy is considered the reference standard, its invasive nature limits routine use. Serum-based non-invasive fibrosis scores have been proposed as alternatives; however, their diagnostic performance in CHB remains variable. This study aimed to compare multiple serum-based non-invasive fibrosis scores with liver biopsy findings and to evaluate their association with histological activity. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 219 adult patients with CHB who underwent liver biopsy with simultaneous laboratory evaluation. Patients with viral co-infections (HIV, HCV, or HDV), metabolic syndrome, diabetes mellitus, hepatic steatosis, or incomplete data were excluded. Non-invasive fibrosis scores-including APRI, FIB-4, AST/ALT ratio (AAR), age-platelet index (API), GGT-to-platelet ratio (GPR), Lok index, modified Forns index, Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) score, and red cell distribution width (RDW)-based indices-were calculated using routine laboratory parameters. Histopathological fibrosis staging served as the reference standard. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and areas under the curve (AUC) were compared using the DeLong test. Associations with histological activity index (HAI) were assessed using Spearman correlation. Results: For the prediction of significant fibrosis (≥F2), FIB-4 demonstrated the highest AUC, followed by ALBI and APRI. For advanced fibrosis (≥F3), FIB-4 again showed the highest AUC, followed by APRI and GPR. For significant fibrosis (≥F2), DeLong analysis revealed no statistically significant differences between FIB-4 and the other serum-based scores (p > 0.05). APRI (r = 0.556, p < 0.001) and FIB-4 (r = 0.463, p < 0.001) showed the strongest correlations with HAI. In ROC analysis for moderate-to-severe histological activity (HAI ≥ 4), APRI demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.677). Conclusions: Serum-based non-invasive fibrosis scores demonstrate comparable but overall modest diagnostic performance for biopsy-confirmed fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Indices such as FIB-4 and APRI demonstrated relatively better discrimination and may be considered as screening or rule-out tools in selected clinical contexts. APRI and FIB-4 also show associations with histological activity; however, their clinical application should be interpreted with caution, given their moderate discriminatory capacity.
Related Concept Videos
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test
Cirrhosis I: Introduction
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Drug Dosing and Hepatic Blood Flow
Cirrhosis II: Pathophysiology

