Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English
Published on: April 3, 2026
Interpretable QSAR and Complementary Docking for PARP1 Inhibitor Prioritization: Reliability Stratification and
Alaa M Elsayad1, Khaled A Elsayad2
1Biomedical Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Wadi Alddawasir 11991, Saudi Arabia.
Abstract:
Background/Objectives: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) is an important therapeutic target in DNA repair-deficient cancers, but discovery of new inhibitors remains constrained by scaffold convergence, tolerability limits, and acquired resistance. This study aimed to develop an interpretable, reliability-stratified cheminformatics workflow for PARP1 potency prioritization and structure-based follow-up. Methods: A curated ChEMBL dataset of 3339 PARP1 inhibitors was encoded using RDKit 2D descriptors and Avalon fingerprints (1143 initial features), then reduced to 132 informative variables by Random Forest-based feature selection. Five regression models were optimized, including a stacked ensemble. Model interpretation was performed using permutation feature importance and SHAP. External near-domain corroboration was assessed using a stringent PubChem similarity expansion (Tanimoto > 0.90) around sub-10 nM seed compounds, followed by comparison with retrievable experimental PARP1 activity values. Top scaffold-diverse candidates were further evaluated by complementary docking against PARP1 (PDB: 4R6E) using AutoDock Vina and cavity-guided docking through the SwissDock platform. Results: The stacked ensemble achieved the best held-out performance (test R2 = 0.723; RMSE = 0.610 pIC50 units), with 83.7% of test predictions within ≤0.75 pIC50 units and only 2.7% exceeding 1.5 pIC50 units. PubChem similarity expansion retrieved approximately 32,450 analogs, of which 3349 were predicted to have IC50 ≤ 10 nM. Among 366 compounds with retrievable experimental PARP1 activity values, predicted versus experimental pIC50 showed a positive association (R2 = 0.124; Pearson r = 0.479), with RMSE = 0.491 and MAE = 0.330 pIC50 units. Three ligands-CID 168873053, CID 175154210, and CID 172894737-showed the strongest complementary docking support and pocket-consistent poses relative to niraparib. Conclusions: This workflow provides a transparent and practically useful framework for near-domain PARP1 inhibitor prioritization. The combined QSAR, explainability, external corroboration, and docking strategy supports shortlist generation for experimental follow-up.
More Related Videos
10:29Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
Published on: May 9, 2025
08:38Genome-wide Protein-protein Interaction Screening by Protein-fragment Complementation Assay PCA in Living Cells
Published on: March 3, 2015