Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control
Published on: August 15, 2020
Vehicle-Conditional Split-Conformal Calibration for Risk-Budgeted Sub-Second Proxy-Triggered Vehicle Instability
Jinzhe Yang1, Jianzheng Liu1, Kai Tian2
1College of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Tianjin 300222, China.
None:
Emergency maneuvers can drive vehicles into severe instability regimes within sub-second time scales, motivating last-moment warning interfaces with auditable false-alarm budgets. We study a proxy-triggered imminent-recognition setting: given a 0.1 s past-only slice of onboard signals, decide whether a conservative physics-defined instability proxy will trigger within the next τ=0.2 s. The contribution is, therefore, a calibrated warning for a safety-relevant surrogate event, not a claim of predicting crashes or true instability outcomes directly. Because the corpus is terminal-phase aligned, the default causal monitor (w=d=0.1 s, k=2) is warnable on only 18.3% of event runs; we, therefore, report run-level effectiveness both overall and conditional on warnability. We learn a lightweight hazard scorer and convert its scores into an operator-facing alarm rule via split-conformal calibration on held-out negative slices, exposing a slice-level false-alarm budget α with finite-sample, one-sided control of the marginal slice-level false positive rate (FPR) on exchangeable negatives. To address fleet heterogeneity, we additionally calibrate vehicle-conditioned (Mondrian) thresholds, enabling per-vehicle risk budgeting without retraining separate models. On the held-out test split at τ=0.2 s, the scorer achieves AUPRC ≈0.251 against a base rate of 0.638%, AUROC ≈0.986, and ECE ≈0.034. After calibration at α=5%, realized slice-level FPR concentrates near the prescribed budget while slice-level TPR on imminent positives remains high (≈0.982). We explicitly separate this slice-level guarantee from empirical run-level metrics such as FARrun, EWR on warnable runs, and lead time, and we report dependence and shift diagnostics to delineate where the guarantee may degrade. The reported μ-sensitivity analyses concern run-level descriptor perturbation and omission rather than validation of a within-run friction estimator with temporal lag. The result is a transparent, risk-budgeted monitoring primitive for last-moment vehicle-stability warning under clearly stated exchangeability assumptions.
Related Concept Videos
Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares
For data that follow a straight line, the standard method for fitting is the linear...
Controller Configurations
Control-system compensation involves various configurations, most commonly series or cascade compensation, in which the controller...
Instrument Calibration
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...
Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient
