Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification
Published on: April 6, 2020
Comparison of Anomaly Detection Methods on Event-Based Vision Sensor Data in a High Noise Environment
Will Johnston1, Anthony Franz2, Shannon Young2
1Department of Engineering Physics, Air Force Institute of Technology, 2950 Hobson Way, Fairborn, OH 45433, USA.
Abstract:
Event-based vision sensors (EVSs) provide unique frequency analysis opportunities due to their event data output and high temporal resolution. Anomaly detection methods used in hyperspectral analysis can be used on the event frequency spectra to detect targets. However, the introduction of a strong, flickering interfering source can reduce the EVS sensitivity and obscure targets of interest. Previous work presented a method showing that targets could still be detected through an overwhelming source using frequency analysis, background suppression, and statistical filtering. This paper extends that research and compares the ability of five different eigenanalysis anomaly detection methods (principal component background suppression (PCBS) with peak threshold detection, Mahalanobis distance (MD) detector, complementary subspace detector (CSD), Reed-Xiaoli (RX) detector, and subspace Reed-Xiaoli (SSRX) detector) to detect targets in a high noise environment. The PCBS, MD, and CSD detectors performed well and were able to detect the targets through the overwhelming source. The PCBS detector had the best performance at low false-alarm rates (a > 400% detection probability increase at a false-alarm probability of 10-5). While the MD and CSD detectors had the best detection at higher false-alarm probabilities (approximately 7 × 10-2), the MD detector had a sub-second execution time. Depending on the application, the PCBS or MD detector are the best choice out of these five methods to detect targets in this type of high noise environment.
