Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

08:05
Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification
Published on: April 6, 2020
12.6K
Comparison of Anomaly Detection Methods on Event-Based Vision Sensor Data in a High Noise Environment
Will Johnston1, Anthony Franz2, Shannon Young2
1Department of Engineering Physics, Air Force Institute of Technology, 2950 Hobson Way, Fairborn, OH 45433, USA.
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|May 4, 2026
Summary
Event-based vision sensors (EVSs) can detect targets even with strong interference. Principal Component Background Suppression (PCBS) and Mahalanobis Distance (MD) detectors show the best performance in high noise environments.
Area of Science:
- Computer Vision
- Signal Processing
- Sensor Technology
Background:
- Event-based vision sensors (EVSs) offer high temporal resolution and unique event data output.
- Anomaly detection in hyperspectral analysis can be adapted for EVS event frequency spectra.
- Strong interfering sources can significantly reduce EVS sensitivity and obscure targets.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare five eigenanalysis anomaly detection methods for target detection in high noise EVS data.
- To evaluate detector performance in the presence of overwhelming interfering sources.
- To identify optimal detection methods for challenging EVS applications.
Main Methods:
- Applied Principal Component Background Suppression (PCBS), Mahalanobis Distance (MD), Complementary Subspace Detector (CSD), Reed-Xiaoli (RX), and Subspace Reed-Xiaoli (SSRX) detectors.
- Utilized frequency analysis, background suppression, and statistical filtering techniques.
- Evaluated detection probability against false-alarm probability in simulated high noise conditions.
Main Results:
- PCBS, MD, and CSD detectors successfully detected targets through strong interference.
- PCBS demonstrated superior performance at low false-alarm rates (e.g., >400% detection increase at 10-5 false-alarm probability).
- MD and CSD excelled at higher false-alarm rates (approx. 7 × 10-2), with MD offering sub-second execution.
Conclusions:
- PCBS and MD detectors are recommended for target detection in high noise EVS environments.
- The choice between PCBS and MD depends on the specific application's requirements for false-alarm rate and speed.
- Eigenanalysis anomaly detection methods show promise for robust target identification with EVS technology.
