Related Experiment Videos
Toward Adversarial Robustness Network Intrusion Detection Based on Multi-Model Ensemble Approach
Thi-Thu-Huong Le1, Jaehan Cho2, Dawit Shin2
1Blockchain Platform Research Center, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Republic of Korea.
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|May 4, 2026
Summary
Machine learning network intrusion detection systems (NIDS) face adversarial threats. This study shows defenses are dataset-specific, with median filtering being a fragile component, and no universal defense exists for tabular NIDS data.
Area of Science:
- Cybersecurity
- Machine Learning
- Network Security
Background:
- Machine learning-based network intrusion detection systems (NIDS) are susceptible to adversarial attacks.
- Existing robustness research for tabular NIDS data is limited by single-model, single-dataset, and non-adaptive evaluations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a comparative robustness study of a four-component defense pipeline for tabular NIDS.
- To evaluate the dataset and architecture dependence of adversarial defenses.
Main Methods:
- Evaluated XGBoost, LightGBM, TabNet, and Residual MLP on RT_IOT2022 and Web_IDS23 datasets.
- Assessed performance under standard, constrained, and adaptive attacks, including component-wise ablations and sensitivity analyses.
- Measured per-class F1 scores and computational overhead.
Main Results:
- Defense effectiveness shows strong dependence on dataset and model architecture.
- Tree-based models on RT_IOT2022 reduced robustness gaps but impacted clean accuracy; Residual MLP offered a better balance.
- On Web_IDS23, simpler defenses sometimes outperformed the full pipeline; median filtering proved to be the most fragile component.
Conclusions:
- Adversarial defense for tabular NIDS is validation-driven and dataset-specific.
- The evaluated four-component defense stack is not a universal solution and requires careful tuning.
- Deployment limitations include minority-class collapse and significant training costs.