Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026
Analysis of the Ambient Particulate Matter-induced Chromosomal Aberrations Using an In Vitro System
Published on: December 21, 2016
Comparing Performance and Reliability of Collocated Enhanced Children's MicroPEM (ECM) on Gravimetric and
Erick Mollinedo1, John P McCracken2,3, Michael Johnson4
1Department of Environmental Health Science, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.
None:
Traditional gravimetric instruments used for personal air pollution exposure measurements are often cumbersome and noisy and do not offer real-time assessment capability. The Enhanced Children's MicroPEM (ECM) is a comparatively lightweight and quiet instrument designed to capture both integrated filter-based gravimetric samples and real-time continuous (nephelometric) particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 μm or less (PM2.5) concentrations. We assessed the performance and reliability of collocated ECMs in a subset of pregnant women participating in a randomized controlled trial in Guatemala to test a liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) cookstove (intervention) versus biomass (control) for cooking. We compared average daily (24 h) PM2.5 concentrations for the paired gravimetric (n = 219) and paired adjusted nephelometric (n = 221) samples using Spearman correlation and Bland-Altman agreement; we also assessed reliability based on the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and root mean square error (RMSE). Median PM2.5 gravimetric concentrations were 93.5 μg/m3 (interquartile range (IQR = 52.6 - 160.5) and 21.4 μg/m3 (IQR = 12.0 - 32.0) in the control and LPG intervention groups, respectively; the median adjusted nephelometric concentrations were 83.7 μg/m3 (IQR = 47.6 - 148 9) and 22.6 μg/m3 (IQR = 17.5 - 29.7) in the control and LPG groups, respectively. Spearman correlations were higher in the control arm (0.91) than in the LPG intervention arm (0.67) in the gravimetric comparisons. The same trend was observed for adjusted nephelometric measurements in the control (0.92) and intervention arms (0.75). ICC values were high in both gravimetric (0.93) and nephelometric (0.95) collocations. Small differences in RMSE were observed for the gravimetric (26.69 μg/m3) and nephelometric collocations (31.76 μg/m3). Our findings demonstrate strong reliability between collocated ECMs for both gravimetric and adjusted nephelometric PM2.5 personal exposure samples in rural Guatemala.
Trial Registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02944682.
More Related Videos
05:45Composition and Distribution Analysis of Bioaerosols Under Different Environmental Conditions
Published on: January 7, 2019
09:33Visualizing Field Data Collection Procedures of Exposure and Biomarker Assessments for the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Trial in India
Published on: December 23, 2022
