Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

A Protocol for Constructing a Rat Wound Model of Type 1 Diabetes
Published on: February 17, 2023
Predictive Value and Clinical Validation of Serum γ-Glutamyltransferase to Platelet Ratio Index for Type 2 Diabetes
Dan Liu1, Xinqin Song1, Yi Wang1
1Department of Laboratory Medicine, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Laboratory Medicine, Zigong Fourth People's Hospital, Zigong, Sichuan, China.
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo investigate the predictive value of the γ-glutamyltransferase (GGT) to platelet (PLT) ratio (GPR) for the risk of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) in persons living with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).MethodsWe included 435 persons with T2DM at Zigong Fourth People's Hospital from January 2023 to December 2024. Participants were divided into a DFU group (n = 87) and a non-DFU group (n = 348) based on DFU status. Baseline, clinical, and biochemical data were collected. Using R 4.3.1, 70% of data were randomly assigned as training set and 30% as test set. Univariate and binary logistic regression analyses identified factors influencing DFU. Models included regression, gradient boosting, and random forests. Their predictive ability was evaluated by AUC. A separate validation set of 287 T2DM patients from January to December 2025 was also included.ResultsIn the training set, the DFU group exhibited significantly higher proportions of males, higher body mass index, higher prevalence of smoking history, and higher GPR and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels than the non-DFU group (P < .05). Logistic regression analysis identified sex, smoking history, GPR, HbA1c, and LDL as independent risk factors for DFU in T2DM patients. The AUCs for training were 0.797, 0.889, and 0.926 for the nomogram, gradient boosting, and random forest models, respectively, with test set AUCs of 0.825, 0.811, and 0.817. External validation showed the random forest model had the best performance.ConclusionMale sex, smoking, elevated GPR, elevated HbA1c, and elevated LDL are risk factors for DFU in persons living with T2DM. Among the three models built using these factors, the random forest model demonstrated the best performance across the evaluation metrics, followed by the gradient boosting machine model, and then the nomogram model.
More Related Videos
06:50A High-Throughput Electrochemiluminescence 7-Plex Assay Simultaneously Screening for Type 1 Diabetes and Multiple Autoimmune Diseases
Published on: May 29, 2020
07:22Glycemic Impact on Knee Osteoarthritis Symptoms on Physical, Radiographic, and Inflammatory Markers among Individuals Aged 50 and Over with Diabetes
Published on: March 7, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Type II Diabetes Mellitus III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnosis
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Diabetic Foot Ulcer