Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026
Techniques of Laparoscopic Right Posterior Sectionectomy: Glissonian Approach and a Parenchymal Transection Technique
Published on: October 6, 2023
Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma Cytoreduction Outcomes and Perioperative Serum Tumor Marker Levels
Vinay K Pattalachinti1,2, Ashlee Seldomridge3, Abdelrahman Yousef1
1Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Background:
Appendiceal adenocarcinoma (AA) is a rare gastrointestinal cancer that frequently presents with peritoneal metastases; the standard of care for resectable peritoneal metastases from AA limited to the peritoneum is cytoreductive surgery (CRS) followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Three serum tumor markers (TMs)-carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), and cancer antigen 125 (CA125)-may play a role in preoperative and postoperative risk estimation and decision-making in patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC.
Objective:
To evaluate the association of preoperative and postoperative serum TM levels with outcomes in patients with AA or goblet cell adenocarcinoma (GCA) undergoing CRS-HIPEC.
Design, Setting, And Participants:
This retrospective cohort study was conducted in a single quaternary referral cancer center. Software was used to query the MD Anderson internal patient database of patients with AA or GCA to identify a cohort receiving CRS with or without HIPEC between March 2016 and August 2024, with median postoperative follow-up of 35.6 months (range, 1.4-100.5 months). Data were analyzed from June 2024 to March 2025.
Exposure:
Preoperative and postoperative levels of CEA, CA19-9, and CA125.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
Association of preoperative and postoperative serum TM levels with tumor burden and likelihood of complete CRS, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS).
Results:
A total of 421 CRSs were included in the study, 376 (89.3%) of which were performed in patients with AA (229 [60.9%] in females; median age at surgery, 56 [IQR, 47-64] years; 290 [77.1%] were complete CRS). In AA, greater vs lesser preoperative tumor burden was associated with increased median serum TM levels (CEA: 9.5 [IQR, 3.7-42.3] ng/mL vs 3.0 [IQR, 2.1-5.9] ng/mL; CA19-9: 31.1 [IQR, 10.0-102.3] U/mL vs 15.0 [IQR, 6.1-25.5] U/mL; CA125: 28.7 [IQR, 13.9-58.5] U/mL vs 11.5 [IQR, 8.0-17.3] U/mL; all P < .001), and after CRS vs before, percentages of patients with TM elevation were significantly lower (CEA: 77 of 223 [34.5%] vs 222 of 340 [65.3%]; CA19-9: 45 of 194 [23.2%] vs 117 of 324 [36.1%]; CA125: 13 of 203 [6.4%] vs 98 of 325 [30.2%]; all P < .001). However, complete vs incomplete CRS was associated with normalized TM levels in a greater percentage of patients (55 of 90 [61.1%] vs 7 of 52 [13.5%]; P < .001). Elevated vs normal preoperative TM levels were associated with increased rate of incomplete CRS (30 of 193 [15.5%] vs 1 of 95 [1.1%]; P < .001) and shorter DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.30; 95% CI, 1.46-3.64; P < .001) but not shorter OS (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.71-2.60; P = .36). Postoperative TM elevation was associated with shorter DFS (HR, 3.73; 95% CI, 2.33-5.95; P < .001) and OS (HR, 4.10; 95% CI, 2.02-8.31; P < .001) in univariate analyses and also in multivariate analyses (HR, 3.34; 95% CI, 1.44-7.75; P = .005), whereas postoperative normalization of all TMs was associated with improved DFS (HR, 3.54; 95% CI, 2.01-6.23; P < .001) and OS (HR, 6.00; 95% CI, 2.06-17.46; P = .001) in univariate analyses and also in multivariate analyses (HR, 4.21; 95% CI, 1.33-13.35; P = .02).
Conclusions And Relevance:
In this cohort study of CRS in patients with AA, elevated serum TM levels were associated with worse outcomes, suggesting that patients with postoperative TM elevation after complete CRS may represent a cohort with residual tumor that requires more cautious surveillance and that both preoperative and postoperative levels of CEA, CA19-9, and CA125 should be assessed in clinical practice.
