Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
Published on: April 8, 2020
Benchmark assessment of collinear, mixed-reference, and spin-adapted variants of spin-flip time-dependent density
Avik Kumar Ojha1, John M Herbert1
1Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA.
Abstract:
Spin-flip methods provide access to certain electronic states having multireference character while retaining single-reference cost. However, conventional spin-flip time-dependent density functional theory (SF-TDDFT) often suffers from severe spin contamination that may cause inaccurate state ordering or engender ambiguous state character. For singlet excited states, this is largely rectified by a "mixed-reference" formulation (MRSF-TDDFT), while a spin-adapted formalism (SA-SF-TDDFT) addresses spin contamination in a general way for arbitrary multiplicities. Here, we revisit SA-SF-TDDFT and demonstrate that it significantly improves the agreement with reference data compared to other variants and also relative to conventional (spin-conserving) linear response TDDFT. Overall, SA-SF-TDDFT proves to be the most accurate among these methods, for excitation energies of both closed-shell molecules and doublet radicals as well as for singlet-triplet gaps. However, SF methods exhibit a notable limitation in the case of linear and quasi-linear doublet radicals, due to degeneracies in the high-spin quartet reference state.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the...
Valence Bond Theory
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

