Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mechanistic Models: Overview of Compartment Models01:21

Mechanistic Models: Overview of Compartment Models

588
Mechanistic models, a category encompassing both physiological and compartmental modeling, differ from empirical models' approaches to incorporating known factors about the systems being modeled. Empirical models describe data with minimal assumptions, while mechanistic models aim to provide a robust description of available data by specifying assumptions and integrating known factors about the system. Compartmental analysis is a key example of a mechanistic model in pharmacokinetics and...
588
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models01:06

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models

335
Pharmacokinetic models are mathematical constructs that represent and predict the time course of drug concentrations in the body, providing meaningful pharmacokinetic parameters. These models are categorized into compartment, physiological, and distributed parameter models.
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...
335
Pharmacokinetic Models: Overview01:20

Pharmacokinetic Models: Overview

2.7K
Pharmacokinetic models utilize mathematical analysis to achieve a detailed quantitative understanding of a drug's life cycle within the body. They are instrumental in simulating a drug's pharmacokinetic parameters, predicting drug concentrations over time, optimizing dosage regimens, linking concentrations with pharmacologic activity, and estimating potential toxicity.
There are three primary types of models: empirical, compartment, and physiological. Empirical models, with minimal...
2.7K
Model-Independent Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Noncompartmental Analysis00:59

Model-Independent Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Noncompartmental Analysis

428
Noncompartmental analyses offer an alternative method for describing drug pharmacokinetics without relying on a specific compartmental model. In this approach, the drug's pharmacokinetics are assumed to be linear, with the terminal phase log-linear. This assumption allows for simplified analysis and interpretation of the drug's behavior in the body.
One important characteristic of noncompartmental analyses is that drug exposure increases proportionally with increasing doses. This...
428
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Compartment Models01:14

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Compartment Models

896
Compartmental analysis is a widely adopted approach to characterizing drug pharmacokinetics. It uses compartment models that conceptualize the body as a collection of reversibly communicating compartments, each representing a group of tissues exhibiting similar drug distribution characteristics. The movement rate of the drug between these compartments is typically described by first-order kinetics.
Two primary types of compartment models are recognized: mammillary and catenary. The more...
896
Multicompartment Models: Overview01:14

Multicompartment Models: Overview

715
Multicompartment models are mathematical constructs that depict how drugs are distributed and eliminated within the body. They segment the body into several compartments, symbolizing various physiological or anatomical areas connected through drug transfer processes such as absorption, metabolism, distribution, and elimination.
These models offer a more comprehensive representation of drug behavior in the body than one-compartment models. They accommodate the complexity of drug distribution,...
715

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Forensic Clinical Identification of Aortic Dissection Complicated with Delayed Intestinal Rupture: A Case Report].

Fa yi xue za zhi·2026
Same author

Measuring the exposome: a practical guide for using wearable passive samplers to assess environmental influences.

Exposome·2026
Same author

Moxibustion Modulates ALOX15-Mediated Lipid Peroxidation to Inhibit Ferroptosis in Synovial Inflammatory Injury of Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Mediators of inflammation·2026
Same author

Prediction of Coal Spontaneous Combustion Risk under Poor Oxygen Concentration Based on Fuzzy Clustering and Lattice Tightness.

ACS omega·2026
Same author

Assessment and spatial characterization of ground-level ozone exposure using a low-cost sensor network.

Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)·2026
Same author

Standard: human breast cancer organoids derived from diverse clinical sample sources.

Cell regeneration (London, England)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 6, 2026

Author Spotlight: Emerging Technologies and Advanced Tools for Decoding Metabolomics Data Analysis
07:11

Author Spotlight: Emerging Technologies and Advanced Tools for Decoding Metabolomics Data Analysis

Published on: November 10, 2023

3.1K

A multi-dimensional modeling framework integrating metabolomics analysis and process modeling for bioprocess

Yingting Shi1, Jingyu Jiao2, Yuxiang Wan3

  • 1Pharmaceutical Informatics Institute, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.

Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
|May 4, 2026
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a new modeling framework using deterministic screening design and metabolomics to understand how process parameters affect antibody production. The developed dynamic models accurately predict cell culture outcomes, improving bioprocess optimization.

Keywords:
CHO-K1 cell cultureCritical process parametersDoEMetabolomicsProcess modelingmAb Production

More Related Videos

High-Throughput Metabolic Profiling for Model Refinements of Microalgae
11:07

High-Throughput Metabolic Profiling for Model Refinements of Microalgae

Published on: December 4, 2021

3.6K
FIBS-enabled Noninvasive Metabolic Profiling
09:16

FIBS-enabled Noninvasive Metabolic Profiling

Published on: February 3, 2014

9.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 6, 2026

Author Spotlight: Emerging Technologies and Advanced Tools for Decoding Metabolomics Data Analysis
07:11

Author Spotlight: Emerging Technologies and Advanced Tools for Decoding Metabolomics Data Analysis

Published on: November 10, 2023

3.1K
High-Throughput Metabolic Profiling for Model Refinements of Microalgae
11:07

High-Throughput Metabolic Profiling for Model Refinements of Microalgae

Published on: December 4, 2021

3.6K
FIBS-enabled Noninvasive Metabolic Profiling
09:16

FIBS-enabled Noninvasive Metabolic Profiling

Published on: February 3, 2014

9.1K

Area of Science:

  • Biotechnology
  • Bioprocess Engineering
  • Metabolic Engineering

Background:

  • Traditional bioprocess development often overlooks dynamic cell culture trajectories, focusing instead on endpoint results.
  • Existing methods like design of experiment (DoE) and response surface methodology have limitations in capturing real-time process dynamics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a multi-dimensional modeling framework integrating deterministic screening design (DSD), time-resolved metabolomics, and process modeling.
  • To elucidate how critical process parameters (CPPs) regulate antibody titer and quality attributes during cell culture.
  • To enable mechanistic understanding and real-time prediction of bioprocesses for improved optimization and scale-up.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized DSD to identify key regulators of antibody titer and quality.
  • Employed time-resolved metabolomics to reveal underlying metabolic mechanisms influenced by CPPs (temperature, inoculation density, pH).
  • Developed Gaussian process regression (GPR) dynamic models integrating time-series metabolite data and CPPs for predictive modeling.

Main Results:

  • DSD identified key CPPs affecting antibody production.
  • Metabolomics revealed that temperature and inoculation density impact amino acid and energy metabolism, while pH affects central carbon flux.
  • GPR dynamic models accurately predicted viable cell density and antibody titer (test-set R² > 0.90), outperforming linear (PLS) and machine learning (boosted trees, neural networks) models.

Conclusions:

  • The integrated framework provides mechanistic insights into bioprocess regulation.
  • The developed GPR models offer accurate real-time prediction of bioprocess performance.
  • This approach serves as a valuable tool for robust bioprocess optimization and scale-up in upstream biomanufacturing.